Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

marginally nonsignificantp = .0521.0× alphagold
Participants became faster at completing the VAAST on their second attempt (post-intervention) [ t( 50) = 9.70, p < .001, d = 1.36] and correspondingly there was a marginally nonsignificant reduction in their time estimates [ t( 50) = 1.99, p = .052, d = 0.28].
nearly significantp = 0.0521.0× alphagold
After accounting for age and sex, in the rural group the factors maintained the same pattern of relationships with depression as before, with trust being nearly significant (p = 0.052); but neither sex nor age was a significant predictor of depression directly (p = 0.46 and p = 0.27, respectively).
only marginally significantP = 0.0521.0× alphagold
The time required to capture the first prey item decreased substantially between the lowest and highest temperatures (19°C: 29.9±57.1 s, 24°C: 56.2±83.4 s, 29°C: 8.6±15.4 s; mean ± s.d.) although this relationship was not straightforward and was only marginally significant (GLM χ 2 = 5.92, d.f. = 2, P = 0.052).
showed a trendP = 0.0521.0× alpha
However, mice receiving 5-ASA showed a trend towards lower plasma triglycerides (0.91±0.12 vs. 0.59±0.10, P = 0.052, Fig 1E ), whereas no effect was seen on the plasma levels of free ( Fig 1F ) and total cholesterol ( Fig 1G ). 5-ASA treatment improves plasma lipid levels in HFC-fed mice To assess whether 5-ASA may improve plasma lipid levels in the setting of diet-induced obesity (DIO), we challenged C57BL/6J mice with either a HFC diet or HFC incorporated with 5-ASA for 12 weeks.
marginally non-significantP = 0.0521.0× alpha
With data from May 2020, a higher recommended distance was associated with a lower transmission rate, as expected, although this effect was marginally non-significant ( Table 1 , β = -0.912, SE = 0.48, P = 0.052, model using Arroyo-Marioli et al. data [ 35 ], β = -0.88, SE = 0.48, P = 0.06, model using Ritchie et al. data [ 36 ]).
showed a trendp = 0.0521.0× alpha
did not reach statistical significancep = 0.1262.5× alphaplainly factual
Although the percent errors of Task 1 ( Figure 2A ) and Task 2 for non-Stroop trials ( Figure 2D ) did not reach statistical significance (Spearman's correlation coefficient = 0.386; p = 0.126; Spearman's correlation coefficient = 0.391; p = 0.121, respectively), Task 2 showed a trend toward a positive association (Spearman's correlation coefficient = 0.478; p = 0.052) ( Figure 2B ).
showed a trendp = .0521.0× alpha
Specifically, in Session 1, 3h participants spent significantly more time in the reward containing zone than did both the 30min ( β = 0.08, SE = 0.04, t = 2.09, p = .038) and 27h ( β = 0.09, SE = 0.04, t = 2.19, p = .030) groups and, in Session 2, showed a trend of more time than did the 30min group ( β = 0.08, SE = 0.04, t = 1.96, p = .052); all other pairwise comparisons were not significant (i.e., there were no differences between the 30min group and the 27h group; |t|<1.24, p>0.21).