Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

a decreasing trendP >0.051.0× alphagold
did not reach statistical significanceP >0.051.0× alphaplainly factual
Although there was a decreasing trend in the IRS-1 mRNA expression level in cells transfected with miR-126 mimic, it did not reach statistical significance between the two groups tested ( P >0.05) ( Figure 3B ).
In five studies with low-priority scale, the results showed that the sexual function of the participants in the nursing intervention group was better than that in the control group, and the differences were very close to statistical significance (SMD = −0.72, 95% CI = [−1.43–−0.00], P = 0.05) ( Fig 4B ). 3.4.2.
a decreasing trendP <0.051.0× alphagold
The P n and PE values of the cotton leaves in the salt dust treatment groups all showed a decreasing trend compared to the control with significant differences between groups A and (B, C), and D, and E, and F ( P <0.05), but no significant differences were observed between groups B and C.
an increasing trendP < 0.051.0× alphagold
Patients aged 60–80 and over 80 years exhibited significantly higher incidence rates compared to those under 60 years (all P < 0.05) A total of 416 strains were identified, with Gram-negative bacteria accounting for 86.5%, primarily represented by Klebsiella pneumoniae (31.0%), while pseudomonas aeruginosa (21.4%) and stenotrophomonas maltophilia (5.3%) demonstrated an increasing trend in the period of 2022–2023 (both P < 0.05).
nearly significantp = 0.051.0× alphagold
Interestingly, while IL-10 levels were substantially suppressed from the end of treatment onwards, the decrease in TNF-alpha started later; it was nearly significant at the end of treatment (2.82 pg/mL, p = 0.05) and this was confirmed, although with a smaller decrease, at each consecutive time point (2.19 pg/mL and 2.09 pg/mL at SVR4 and 12, respectively).
moderately significantp = 0.051.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Subgroup analysis In terms of the effect size of the amount of change in DCS scores, a moderately significant tendency was observed with “uncertainty” [Z (22) = –1.94, p = 0.05, r = 0.41] and “effective decision-making” [Z (22) = –2.24, p = 0.03, r = 0.48] in people who were living alone and with “clarification of values” [t (49) = 1.90, p = 0.06, d = 0.55] in older adults aged 75 and older.