“extremely significant”

When comparing the maximal hamstring muscle strength mean values of both, the static stretching group Baseline/Acute phase and the Baseline/Chronic phase, one could observe an extremely significant difference ( P = 0.000) (Table 4 ).

Regarding evolution over time within each group, in the PA Group there were no significant differences from T0 to T1 ( p = 0.248), with an extremely significant increase in the result from T1 to T2 ( p = 0.000), and an extremely significant difference between T0 and T2 ( p = 0.000) as well.

The results of showed that there was an extremely significant difference between the NS group and the LTG group on the 1st postoperative day (P = 0.000).

The analysis of variance (ANOVA) for plant height showed extremely significant differences between varieties (p = 0.0000) [ 31 ].

There was an extremely significant association between income and the use of wastewater/faecal sludge for food production without treatment ( F = 3.46809E + 22, P < .00, Partial eta squared = 1).

Genetic differentiation and diagnostic alleles Genetic differentiation between 33 Razor-billed Curassows and 66 animals identified as pure Alagoas Curassows (see results bellow) was high and extremely significant ( F ST = 0.281, P < 0.000).

However, when tested by the independent two-sample t -test (2-tailed), the difference in CO 2 concentrations before and after the ventilation improvement is statistically extremely significant at the 100% confidence interval ( p = 0.000 in Classroom 1, 387 and 740 measurement points; p = 0.008 in Classroom 2, 387 and 718 measurement points).

On statistical analysis, an extremely significant difference was noted ( P = 0.000) [ Table 3 ].

Their difference is small but statistically extremely significant (t-test P -value ≈ 0).

As shown in S10 Fig , the results of the randomization tests indicated that the markers in beta cells generally had higher ranking scores, and exhibited extremely significant differences compared to the ranking scores obtained through random assignment (with p < 0 . 0 0 1 ).

Bartlett’s test results were also extremely significant ( p = 0.00).

In Figure 2 A, LFX alone has obviously curbed biofilm formation, and except for the sample treated by 1⁄2 × MIC LFX ( p < 0.05, n = 4), the differences in other two cases by 1 × MIC and 2 × MIC LFX are extremely significant ( p = 0.000, n = 4) as compared with control.

The increase was extremely significant for the deformity angle (initial vs. 6th month, p =0.000; 6th month vs. 24th month, p =0.000) and kyphotic angle (initial vs. 6th month, p =0.003; 6th month vs. 24th month, p =0.000) in the thoracic and thoracolumbar regions during the first 2 years of the disease process.

Spearman correlation showed that there was an extremely significant linear relationship (r=0.16, 95% CI=2.41–13.44, P <0.000) was observed between number of drugs taken and ADRs.

However, tested by the independent two-sample t -test ( Table 6 ), the difference in medians was statistically extremely significant at the 100% confidence interval ( p = 0.000, 2-tailed).

There were significant differences between the two groups with normal ( P = 0.04) and moderate dysplasia ( P = 0.025), extremely significant differences with mild dysplasia ( P = 0.00), and no significant differences with severe dysplasia ( P = 0.38) and oral cancer ( P = 0.342) ( Figure 4 A).

5 a–h), we found that there was an extremely significant correlation between the fitted hundred-grain weight and the average grain filling rate until maturity (P = 0.000).

Moreover, there were extremely significant differences in the relative abundance of Mesoplasma between the two social forms ( P = 0.000).

On statistical analysis of intergroup comparison, an extremely significant difference ( P = 0.000) was noted [ Table 1 ].

The age subgroup analysis demonstrated that the pooled prevalence of FIPV was 2% (95% CI, 1–3%) for cats over two years old; however, it significantly increased to 15% (95% CI, 8–22%) for kittens aged two years and below, with an extremely significant difference ( p = 0.000) observed between these two age groups ( Figure 6 B).

Statistical analysis by Student’s t test showed that differences between the AMs of FEPGCs in the treated group and those in the control group after treatment were extremely significant (P=0.0000) at each sampling time.

P -values and FDR were extremely significant; indeed top two pathways have zero chance of being false positive ( P = 0; FDR = 0).

The postoperative complication rate was again the highest in Group A (30.5%), low in Group C (8.3%), and extremely low in Group B (1.6%) manifesting an extremely significant association (p = 0.000) .

As shown in Table 5 , there were extremely significant associations between abnormal DV and both T18 and T13 ( P value <1E-324).

The likelihood ratio test was employed to assess the statistical significance of survival differences, revealing an extremely significant divergence in prognosis between the risk groups ( P = 1.9E−303) (Fig. 8 d).