Barely Significant

Excerpts

4,910 sentences · 1 filter applied

a decreasing trendp = 0.255.0× alphagold
In comparison to the control group (28.88 ± 13.27 nmol/L*min), the mean AUC for all three trial days showed a decreasing trend, with the smallest values for the studies performed on the 5th of September (22.9 ± 8.1 nmol/L*min, p = 0.25) and 28th of November 2018 (20.7 ± 10.7 nmol/L*min, n = 0.1684).
showed a trendp = 0.2685.4× alpha
Although obese children with low muscle mass showed a trend toward higher cIMT compared to obese peers without low muscle mass (0.401 ± 0.020 mm vs. 0.389 ± 0.040 mm, p = 0.268; Cohen’s d = 0.328), this difference did not reach statistical significance, likely due to the limited sample size with available cIMT measurements ( n = 11 vs. n = 29).
borderline significantP = 0.5010.0× alphagold
Conversely, in the study based in Japan ( n = 84), with women supplemented during pregnancy and lactation with FOS or a placebo, a borderline significant difference in the number of Bifidobacteria in the intervention group compared to the control group ( P = 0.50), and an increased number of Bifidobacterium longum species were detected ( P = 0.01) [ 31 ]. 3.5.
Its borderline level of statistical significance ( p = 0.51), considering the small study group, may be treated less conservatively, and thus the result—in line with the aforementioned negative associations—may be interpreted as reflecting the same trend of a generally negative influence of carbohydrates on AMH levels, and thus fertility.
a strong trendp = 0.6613.2× alphagold
Fullness was significantly increased after consumption of both meals, ( F (1, 24) = 29.85, p < 0.001), but similar to hunger and desire to eat, there were no significant differences between meals, although a strong trend existed ( F (1, 24) = 0.19, p = 0.66, or meal*time, F (1, 24) = 3.48, p = 0.07). 4.
practically significantp = 0.71314.3× alphagold
Body fat percentage did not change in a statistically significant or practically significant manner (median ± IQR (34.80 ± 10.45 % during baseline vs. 34.80 ± 9.88 % after 2 years, p = 0.713) ( Figure 1 D).
an increasing trendp = 0.9919.8× alphagold
The total feeding time did not change from 7 to 18 weeks of age in the WT group but showed an increasing trend in the mSOD1 group (F(1, 163) = 0.79, p = 0.99, 17 weeks; WT, 180.80 ± 32.03 s, mSOD1, 303.14 ± 39.48, 18 weeks; WT, 89.00 ± 19.49 s, mSOD1, 417.50 ± 151.67 s, repeated-measured ANOVA followed by student- t post hoc comparison, Figure 4 c).