“difference was apparent”

The statistical difference was apparent (P=0.000).

As shown in SI Figure 1 , highly significant difference was apparent in the staining intensities of cancer cells versus stromal cells, with stromal cells showing a nearly 8-fold greater average intensity than the cancer cells ( p -value = 1.54 × 10 −57 ).

This difference was apparent regardless of whether the minor allele is associated with higher (Δmean |log 2 (aFC)| = −0.277; two-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum test: W = 928,592, P = 1.39 × 10 −50 ) or lower expression (Δmean |log 2 (aFC) = −0.268; two-tailed Wilcoxon rank sum test: W = 967,228, P = 2.97 × 10 −47 ), consistent with a model of stabilizing selection whereby gene expression is maintained within an optimal range.

This difference was apparent in the sub-group analysis with the reason for discontinuation specified as lack of improvement/progression of disease (HR = 1.7, p = 10 −6 ), scheduled stop/convenience (HR = 1.6, p = 0.001) or without the reason recorded (HR = 1.5, p = 10 −16 ).

A significant difference was apparent between AEE DLW (784±275 kcal·day −1 ) and AEE ACC (580±178 kcal·day −1 , p<0.0001).

The results showed that the maximum difference was apparent at 2 kHz (29.9 ± 1.3 dB vs. 24.6 ± 0.5 dB, P = 0.0001) (Mitchell et al. 2009 ).

A virtually identical difference was apparent in male 3xTg-AD mice at the 4–6 month timepoints for junction density (**** p < 0.0001, 2-way ANOVA, Figure 6 g) and average vessel length (*** p = 0.0001, 2-way ANOVA, Figure 6 h).

This interspecific difference was apparent by an association test (see Methods), with P = 0.00084 ( Table 1 ).

A similar tendency was noticed for NF-ƙB, for which the difference was apparent at the mRNA level, where the NF-ƙB transcript was significantly more abundant in the liver ( p < 0.001 ) and adipose tissue ( p < 0.001 ) of obese horses.

The same pattern of gender difference was apparent when asked about smoking as a means of managing stress ( p < 0.001), with 27% of men and 62% of women reporting never doing so, 60% of men and 36% of women reporting almost never/seldom/sometimes; 13% of men and 2% of women reporting usually/always, respectively.

However, a significant difference was apparent in the eLF between the LDF group and the NLF group ( p ≤ 0.001).

This treatment difference was apparent from week 6 in the phase II study ( p < 0.001) [ 15 ].

The impact of group was primarily reflected in elevated values for FUM po compared to the other groups (CON: 67.94 a , FB1 iv : 70.48 abc , HFB1 iv : 70.68 ab , FUM po : 73.40 b , FumD po : 65.50 c mg/dL; post hoc Student’s t -test p < 0.05), whereby the most pronounced difference was apparent to the enzyme-treated group FumD po ( post hoc Student’s t -test, p < 0.001).

This difference was apparent at discharge and appeared to be caused by access site bleedings (0.9 vs. 0.1%, p < 0.001).

The material difference was apparent across the chronic rodent removal forces from rodents, which were significantly different ( p < 0.001) between Gold (1.82 ± 1.38) and Pt-Ir (3.76 ± 1.27) across all time points.

While no difference was observed between the LVF ( M = 0.01 ± 0.01) and RVF ( M = 0.002 ± 0.01) for incongruent trials, t (46) = −0.72, p = .956, d = −0.10, a difference was apparent for congruent trials such that the dual-task cost in the RVF ( M = 0.11 ± 0.02) was greater than in the LVF ( M = 0.03 ± 0.01), t (46) = 3.71, p = .001, d = 0.54.

Additionally, a significant difference was apparent between the synchronous and asynchronous static conditions [ t (17) = 4.32, p = .001 (two-tailed), d = 1.759].

A significant difference was apparent in the mean T b between all three ambient temperatures in females (F = 119.66, df 1 = 2, df 2 = 23,751, p<0.001) where the highest T b is observed at 30°C, and the lowest at 25°C.

placebo) suffered from low sample numbers and low power (Figure S3C), but in the male subgroup, a significant difference was apparent in both treatment arms compared to placebo: 0.095% p = 0.001 and 0.5% p = 0.006.

Zenith‐to‐nadir difference No significant effect of training was observed in MCAv mean ( P = 0.837); however, a difference was apparent for MAP ( P = 0.002), with the RE‐trained showing a significantly greater zenith‐to‐nadir difference (see Table 4 ). 4.

Moreover, based on an intent-to-treat analysis of response duration, a highly significant difference was apparent that favored the oblimersen plus Flu/Cy group (hazard ratio = 0.62; P = 0.002; see Figure 4 .

As concern the speed, expressed as the number of inspected rows within the task time limit, a statistically significant difference was apparent between the two experimental sessions ( t 31 = 3.2; p = 0.003), as the subjects were faster in performing the test during T0 (mean ± SE = 19.12 ± 0.63) with respect to T1 (mean ± SE = 17.75 ± 0.7) (Fig. 1b ).

The difference was apparent at 24 h (hyperthermia; mean 2.9±3.6 vs control; mean 26.2±3.5 p=0.004) and at 48 h (hyperthermia; mean 4.4±5.1 vs control; mean 43.4±8.9 p=0.001) after hyperthermia ( Fig. 5 ).

An evaluation of mean speed based on vehicle CAN data indicated a significant overall difference in speed between the two vehicles (Volvo M = 107.5 km/h; Chevrolet M = 111.6 km/h; F (1,78) = 5.4, p < 0.023); this difference was apparent even during baseline just driving periods (109.4 and 113.1 km/h, respectively; F (1,78) = 8.9, p = 0.004).

This significant difference was apparent in the intermediate ( P = 0.004) and high-risk group ( P < 0.001) but not in the low ( P = 0.62) and in the very high-risk group ( P = 0.10; Table 4 ).