Barely Significant

Excerpts

5,163 sentences · 1 filter applied

In the top panel the effect of maraviroc on diminishing arrest for the CCR6 +(high) CCR2 - cells did not quite reach statistical significance ( p = 0.063), whereas the p value was 0.0312 when samples were analyzed specifically for the arrest step using the arrested/rolling cell ratio (bottom panel).
marginally significantp = 0.0631.3× alphagold
Compared to the Col-0 wildtype, the frd3-3 mutant showed a significant reduction of root growth in response to high Zn according to the 2-way ANOVA ( p < 0.001) while the genotype x treatment interaction was marginally significant for frd3-7 ( p = 0.063) (Fig. 1d, e , Supplementary Fig. 4 and Supplementary Table 2 and 3 ).
nearly significantP = 0.0641.3× alphagold
This is also indicated by the nearly significant height × density interaction (generalised linear-mixed model: P = 0.064, Table 1 ) and the clear positive relationship between specific leaf area and the tall-dense treatment in the partial RDA (Fig. 2 ).
Decision-making in plants under competition.
Nat Commun · 2017 · PMC5740169
only marginally significantp = 0.0651.3× alphagold
In a supplementary analysis we tested this left-right horizontal meridian asymmetry using an extended dataset ( n = 54; the 29 observers here and 25 additional observers for whom we have retinotopy measurements but no psychophysics data) and found the slight bias for more surface area along the right than left horizontal meridian was diminished and became only marginally significant ( p = 0.065), d = 0.26; Supplementary Fig. 2 ).
a strong trendp = 0.0651.3× alphagold
At 28 days post 2nd mRNA-1273 vaccination, a strong trend to a lower Spike S1-specific IgG concentration was observed in older adults compared to young adults (p = 0.065) (geometric mean IgG concentration in BAU/mL (95% CI): YA = 2587.8 (2203.9–3038.5), MA = 2217.9 (1874.5–2623.3), and OA = 1832.3 (1513.5–2218.3)) (Fig. 4A ).
a trend towards significanceP =0.0651.3× alpha
Furthermore, when anti-HBsAg was dichotomized using a median split and entered as the dependent variable in binary logistic regression models, T (Nagelkerke R 2 =0.33, Wald=15.12, P <0.001, two-tailed) remained as a significant predictor and T×C showed a trend towards significance (Nagelkerke R 2 =0.08, Wald=3.4, P =0.065, two-tailed), and there was a significant difference in attractiveness between the two groups (low anti-HBsAg: −2.11 (0.96); high anti-HBsAg: −1.45 (1.27); F (1, 72) =6.51, P =0.013, two-tailed).
a trend toward significancep = 0.0651.3× alpha
A logistic regression analysis including context, information source (directional cue or target color), and gaze direction, found a significant main effect of context in Monkey N (t 1,31953 = −2.49 , p < 0.05), and a trend toward significance in Monkey J (t 1,24641 = −1.85, p = 0.065), with better performance on nonsocial trials in both cases.