Barely Significant

Excerpts

5,102 sentences · 1 filter applied

approached significancep = 0.0831.7× alpha
For Fascin, significant differences were observed when comparing patients with MTC with those with adrenal neoplasms ( p = 0.048) and NETs ( p = 0.007), while the differences between patients with NET and controls, as well as between patients with MTC and controls, approached significance ( p = 0.083).
(3) Results: One-way ANOVA showed no significant main effect of IVH severity on crSaO 2 and cFTOE ( p > 0.05); there was a tendency toward statistical significance concerning the difference between the means of crSaO 2 ( p = 0.083) and cFTOE ( p = 0.098).
showed a trendp = 0.0841.7× alpha
However, after the first 48 h of admission, patients with a greater diuretic response on admission (NaU > 80 mmol/L) showed a trend of having fewer pulmonary b-lines (12 vs. 15; p = 0.084), a lower IVC diameter (18 mm vs. 22 mm; p = 0.009), and lower IAP values (11 mmHg vs. 13 mmHg; p = 0.041).
a positive trendp = 0.08411.7× alphagold
Except for a positive trend (Pearson r = 0.2142, p = 0.0841) between expressions of plasma miR-21 and exo-miR-21 in the early stage ( Figure 2 B), significantly positive correlations ( Figure 2 A,C) between plasma miR-21 and exo-miR-21 in all stages (Pearson r = 0.3643, p < 0.0001) and in late stages (Pearson r = 0.5554, p < 0.0001) were observed, suggesting a close relationship between plasma miR-21 and exo-miR-21. 3.3.
Moreover, the difference for having “OFP that progresses while playing” between instrumentalists and vocalists was close to the boundary of significance (for Active Jaw group: OR = 2.904, p = 0.085; for Non-active Jaw group: OR = 3.646, p = 0.069), and most of the confidence intervals were disproportionately over 1.
a decreasing trendp = 0.0861.7× alphagold
After the one-year time point, the difference in all-cause mortality based on L1 SMI quartiles showed a decreasing trend ( p = 0.086; Figure 4 A); however, the incidence of MACE continued to exhibit a significant difference ( p < 0.001; Figure 4 B) throughout the follow-up period, suggesting the potential of L1 SMI to predict both short- and long-term prognosis. 3.6.