Excerpts

Meta-regression showed a trend towards a greater reduction in the severity of depression with more frequent treatment (N = 29, n = 2268, B = 0.095, SE = 0.050, Z = 1.88, p = 0.061).

In subgroup analysis according to clinical presentation, there was a numerical trend toward higher 1-year mortality among patients presenting with ACS compared with CCS (15% vs. 3%, p = 0.061).

This is because our previous research has already demonstrated a significant trend towards correlation between respiratory function and patient age in early-stage peripheral lung cancer ( p = 0.061) [ 18 ].

Furthermore, lymph node dissection (LND) showed a trend toward an association at 6 months (OR, 2.714; 95% CI, 0.954–7.718; p = 0.061) and became a strongly significant predictor of incontinence at 12 months (OR, 6.994; 95% CI, 1.632–29.973; p = 0.009). 3.3.

Mediastinal (N2) station sampling showed a strong trend toward more thorough dissection in the uRATS group (median 4 stations [IQR 3–4] vs. 3 [IQR 2–3]; p = 0.061; Figure 5 C).

All other tests did not significantly correlate, but the PWI was close to significance (correlation coefficient = 0.272, p = 0.061, Figure 4 e) ( Table 5 ). 4.

Although there was no association between plasma Aβ 1-40 levels and MMSE scores ( Figure 1 a), plasma Aβ 1-42 showed a trend, and p-Tau181 levels exhibited a weak negative correlation with MMSE scores (Aβ 1-42 : r = −0.198, p = 0.061; p-Tau181: r = −0.285, p < 0.05), as shown in Figure 1 b and 1d.

Similarly, the size of the fulgurated lesion showed a trend toward larger values in the recurrence group, without reaching statistical significance ( p = 0.061).

Postoperative hormonal therapy showed a trend toward significance ( p = 0.061).

In our multivariable regression model, CN3 palsy showed a trend toward reduced odds of surgical success compared to CN6 palsy ( p = 0.061, OR 0.143, 95% CI: 0.019–1.097).

Although the association did not reach the significant threshold, it approached significance (FDR corrected p = 0.061).

Two variables showed borderline significance—elevated platelet count ( p = 0.061) and higher neutrophil count ( p = 0.081)—both suggesting a possible inflammatory component associated with reduced treatment durability.

The presence of CVD was not independently associated with serum OGN level, although it bordered on significance ( p < 0.061).

cases showed marginal significance with cervical dysplasia ( Table S1 ; p = 0.061).

Age at disease detection was a marginally significant predictor (β = −0.02434, p = 0.061).

In the study group, a rising BMI correlated negatively with consolidation rate to a borderline significance (B = −0.150, p = 0.061).

Only the associations between IVRT and GWE (or vice versa) became not quite statistically significant ( p = 0.0611).

However, the number of patients having a pain score of at least 3 was significantly greater in the MR group compared with the DR group (10 [29%] versus 2 [6%], p = 0.013), while the total amount of administered rescue analgesics in morphine equivalent dose showed a trend towards being lower in the DR group compared with the MR group (6.6 [5.0, 10.0] mg versus 10.0 mg [5.5, 18.2] mg, p = 0.062) ( Table 2 ). 4.

The difference between patients with GD and patients with inactive GO was of borderline significance ( p = 0.062).

0.743 p = 0.062) ( Figure 3 A right), no statistically significant differences were found with borderline significance between the GD group and the inactive GO group ( p = 0.062).

Age showed a trend toward higher values among completers (median, 12 [8; 13] years vs. 9 [7; 11] years; p = 0.062).

The LL and HP parameter change was at the limit of significance ( p = 0.062, Type II risk error 0.648; p = 0.058, Type II risk error 0.64, respectively).

The number of VWML detected in FLAIR correlated significantly only with creatinine (r = −0.33; p = 0.042) and almost significantly with age (r = 0.31; p = 0.062).

The use of bevacizumab in second or later lines remained of borderline significance in the multivariable model (HR 0.69; p = 0.062) ( Table 5 ). 4.

As shown in Figure 2 , PTX3 differences showed a trend between Group 1 vs. 2 ( p = 0.062), as well as were significant differences between Group 1 vs. 3 ( p < 0.01), and Group 2 vs. 3 ( p < 0.01).