Excerpts

Participants over 50 years also demonstrated increased odds of repeat utilization, though this association was marginally significant (AOR: 2.0, 95% CI: 1.0–4.3, p = 0.065).

This finding exhibited marginal significance ( p = 0.066), and post hoc power was estimated to be approximately 56% based on the observed effect size in our study.

However, this difference was only marginally statistically significant ( p -value = 0.066) ( Table 1 ).

This difference approached significance (X 2 (1) = 3.376, p = 0.066).

The linear mixed-effects models showed that, compared with the control group, the intervention was associated with a significantly decreased Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (β = −0.67, p = 0.012), and a marginally significant effect on reducing roommates’ influence on sleep schedule (β = −0.21, p = 0.066).

A similar, but marginally non-significant association was observed regarding father’s educational level (Odds Ratio 0.66; p = 0.066) ( Table 10 ). 4.

Although the prevalence of supplement use was higher among females (61%) compared to males (51%), the association between gender and supplement was close to significance ( p = 0.066), but not below the 0.05 threshold.

With no significant difference in muscle activity in the pre-task assessment, there was nearly significant time × group interaction in right ES ( p = 0.066) only.

The number of sexually active learners who reported more than one sex partner was higher in boys than in girls, though the association was marginally significant (boys = 50% vs. girls = 31.8%; χ 2 (n = 102) = 3.39, p = 0.066).

There was also nearly significant evidence that satisfaction with a latrine as a place for defecation was associated with consistent latrine use behaviour ( p = 0.066). 3.3.

Separately, none of the models using green and blue space availability ( Supplementary Material Table S3 ) showed statistically relevant direct or indirect effects on the outcomes, with the sole exception of a marginally significant increase of 36 g ( p = 0.066) in BW in children delivered by mothers with green-space availability in 300 m in the model using NO 2 concentrations as mediator ( Supplementary Material Table S4 ).

The t-test for changes in AGEs approached significance t(18) = 1.96. p = 0.066.

SOL was significantly higher in the IN compared to the GS group ( p = 0.004) and it showed a trend to a significant difference between the IN and PS as well ( p = 0.066).

Results: In the campus board trial, ANOVA revealed a tendency toward significance ( p = 0.066).

The earlier finding that cigarette smoking was negatively associated with Se [ 65 ] was observed in this study but at borderline significance (B = −0.05, p = 0.066), possibly due to the relatively low statistical power. 4.3.

It is worth highlighting a trend which is nearly significant ( p = 0.066).

A positive correlation (0.78) between the MIR and the number of clinical cases was observed, with results approaching significance (Pearson’s correlation: t = 2.4986, df = 4, p -value = 0.06687, Figure 3 ).

The interaction effect between condition and measure was marginally significant in post-induction, F (1, 82) = 3.44, p < 0.067, η p 2 = 0.04, and simple effect analysis showed that the N3 mean amplitudes of incongruence were greater than that of congruence at post-induction (all ps < 0.01), whereas such an effect was not found at the baseline or post-intervention (all ps > 0.05).

However, this was only marginally significant, R 2 = 0.155, Δ R 2 = 0.066, Δ F (2, 72) = 2.809, p = 0.067; therefore, the effect was not explored further. 3.2.2.

35%; p < 0.001), and it increased almost significantly in patients receiving propafenone (69.9 vs. 100%; p = 0.067).

Digestive disorders other than liver cirrhosis play a role, at least indirectly, in the carriage of MDR-GNB: digestive surgery in the last year was an independent risk factor, and previous gastrointestinal endoscopy, associated with a two-fold risk of carriage, was barely below the level of significance ( p = 0.067).

The difference between concrete and resilient materials approached significance ( p = 0.067).

There was a main effect for time ( p < 0.001) for t-PA antigen, with t-PA antigen increasing following firefighting, and a nearly significant effect for sex ( p = 0.067) (with women having lower values at rest and after firefighting).

Strong social support also alleviated the fear the patients felt, but the association is borderline significant ( p = 0.067).

Results were marginally significant for highly avoidant individuals in the COVID-19 cohort (zero positive signals: simple slope = −0.98, t = −1.83, p = 0.068).