Excerpts

The Externalizing Problems Domain Summary approached significance ( p = 0.06) following the intervention period (see Table 5 ).

Perceived online social support did not have a strong direct effect on the drive for thinness, though the effect was weak and marginally significant (β = −0.11, p = 0.06; CI = −0.61; 0.01).

A significant interaction between groups was observed for FVC ( p = 0.02) and a nearly significant interaction was observed for FEV 1 ( p = 0.06). 3.2.

In particular, these students on average showed a significant increase over time in their awareness of newspaper influences ( F (1, 318) = 3.73, p = 0.05; partial eta square = 0.012; Mean (time 1) = 2.49; SD (time 1) = 1.13, Mean (time 2) = 2.70; SD (time 2) = 1.26), and a close to significance increase in their awareness of TV influences ( F (1, 318) = 3.65, p = 0.06; partial eta square = 0.011; Mean (time 1) = 2.75; SD (time 1) = 1.25, Mean (time 2) = 2.96; SD (time 2) = 1.35) and social media influences ( F (1, 318) = 3.24, p = 0.07; partial eta square = 0.01; Mean (time 1) = 3.47; SD (time 1) = 1.41, Mean (time 2) = 3.69; SD (time 2) = 1.34).

Correlation analysis showed a positive albeit marginally significant association between workload and JA ( r = 0.17, p = 0.06), whereas zero-order correlations between log cortisol/DHEA(S) ratio and workload ( r = 0.07, p = 0.46) or JA ( r = 0.10, p = 0.28) were not significant.

A marginally significant effect of dose was found [ F (1,85) = 3.57, p = 0.06]. 4.

A similar trend was noted for the association between the levels of CO and luteal phase length, but of borderline significance (b = −0.52; p = 0.06).

A comparison of the proportion between those who visited the clinic and those who did not showed marginally statistically significant differences ( p = 0.0606). 4.

The results from the study design show modifying effects at the borderline significant level ( Figure S6 . β = −1.52, p = 0.061), which gained significance after the influential case was removed ( Figure S7 . β = −1.67, p = 0.010). 3.5.

A nearly significant difference occurred in the amount of snacking ( p = 0.061).

For PEMF, VT Abs changed significantly from pretesting to post-testing ( p = 0.001), but CON showed a nonsignificant trend towards difference ( p = 0.061).

Mothers who thought that littering and rubbish was a problem in their area had reduced hazards of stopping exclusive breastfeeding in the constant effects models, and this effect approached significance when SES was controlled for (M2 0.72, p = 0.061).

The difference between males and females approached significance ( p = 0.061).

However, the effect remained close to significance ( p = 0.061).

However, gender demonstrated a marginally significant association ( p = 0.061) with BP scores.

Ratings of ‘nauseous’ showed a trend toward higher ratings in the combination condition in comparison to the nicotine alone condition [F (2, 36) = 3.0, p=.062].

None of the protocols had an impact on the executive function, whereas health-related quality of life showed a trend to significance in the whole sample only (EQindex overall sample, p = 0.062; d = 0.48 CMCT; d = 0.34 AMCT).

After adjusting for covariates, the group × time interaction coefficient for outpatient clinic visits was 1.83 among all participants (marginal significance; p = 0.062) and 4.58 ( p < 0.01) among those with low income.

The difference between groups at the old airport location before the move was marginally significant p = 0.062 [ 23 ], but not any more after the move.

In Table 3 , the risk of NAET was still significantly increased for wood working ( p = 0.028), whilst a trend towards significance was calculated for leatherworking, p = 0.062.

There was no significant difference between hair Hg in those with active disease ( n = 6) (1.2 ppm) compared to those with inactive disease ( n = 46) (1.69 ppm) as determined by BILAG, albeit this approached significance ( p = 0.062).

Although it is shown that the intrinsic orientation group scores higher in positive affect, close to significance when compared with the empty orientation group ( p = 0.062), this result should be considered tendentially.

However, when analyzing the conditional effect of Family’s Income on BMI at the values of KHE, data indicates that for higher scores on KHE the effect of Family’s Income on BMI is marginally statistically significant ( b = 0.0909, p = 0.0624).

These differences did not become significant, although in the case of the CI, it did come close to significance ( p = 0.063).

Total body discomfort had a moderate correlation with creative problem solving errors (rho = 0.480, p = 0.032), approached significance with mental state (rho = 0.423, p = 0.063), however was not significantly correlated with unique designs, No-go success, or reaction time (see Table 7 ). 4.