Excerpts

The energy cost of running in the slower runners during the marathon increased almost significantly at the 30th km ( p = 0.06) ( Figure 4 ) because some of them started to walk. 4.

Due to the small number of participants borderline significant results (p < 0.06) were also retained in the final models and are also presented.

Specifically, individuals with a grandparent who attended IRS, but not a parent, spent more time in the CWS compared to those with no IRS family history, but this only approached significance, χ 2 (1) = 3.65, p = 0.06.

When exploring within-group correlations, depressed mothers continued to show no correlation between perceived and observed interaction quality, r (43) = −0.13, p = 0.40, while the correlation for mothers in the control group approached significance in the expected direction r (24) = −0.38, p = 0.06 (higher reported dysfunctional interaction associated with lower dyadic interaction quality). 3.4.

Participants who gardened had lower mean (5.1) and median (4) anxiety scores than non-gardeners (6.04; 6), but these findings were only marginally significant for mean scores ( p = 0.06) and not significant for median scores ( Table 1 ).

The overall F-test was marginally significant ( p = 0.06).

Pinch strength As the forest plot in Figure 9 shows, iontophoresis showed a trend to be less effective than phonophoresis in improving pinch strength, but the pooled results did not indicate differences between interventions (MD = −2.05 ( p = 0.06); 95% CI (−4.39 to 0.29); I 2 = 0% and Tau 2 = 0).

However, when measuring differences in the CHO intake between genders in each climbing level, marginally significant differences were found in the intermediate ( p = 0.06; Z = −1.88) and the elite ( p = 0.06; Z = −1.88) group, with no significance in the advanced group ( p = 0.13; Z = −1.50) The dietary intake of macro and micronutrients of male and female climbers on different climbing levels is presented in Table 4 .

Overall, however, the effect sizes were smaller and the association between total physical activity and self-regulation was not quite statistically significant (B = 0.18, SE = 0.10, p = 0.06) ( Table 2 ). 3.3.

No significant difference was found for reward focus between active and control conditions for EFT-Full Raw [ p = 0.93] Reward focus was higher in active FTP conditions, but only approached significance compared to control [2.16(1.51) vs. 0.96(1.04); p = 0.06].

In our results, the decrease in the prevalence of insufficient PA was close to significance ( p = 0.06), but a clear trend was observed across all countries.

As well, full-time student status yielded significantly better scores in 2017 ( p < 0.001), and nearly significant ( p = 0.06) in 2022.

Although the variation in practice across grades was only marginally significant ( p = 0.06), Grade 9 learners reported the highest level of hygiene practice (M = 0.54), indicating a possible trend.

Additionally, this effect was only marginally significant between new donors and loyal donors ( β λ 1 = −0.28, p = 0.06) but was not significant between loyal donors and regular donors ( β λ 4 = −0.25, p = 0.16).

A logistic regression model ( Table 4 ), demonstrated that a reduction in dog’s total weekly walking duration during the lockdown was associated with dog owners who were vulnerable or were living with a vulnerable household member compared to not ( p = 0.04) and nearly significant with owners who lived alone compared to with others ( p = 0.06).

None of the other predictor variables were significant, although caregiver depressive affect was trending toward significance ( t = 1.83, p = 0.06).

However, the indirect path father’s NPR to child’s RED to child’s learning difficulties to child academic performance only narrowly missed significance (path a1 *b1*b3, b = 0.05 SE = 0.03, p = 0.06, CI (−0.002, 0.13)).

The addition of transitivity and the out-degree in models 2 and 3 each approached significance at p < 0.06.

Noteworthily, a negative association (although only marginally significant, p = 0.06) was identified between upstream wetlands and geometric mean concentrations of E. coli for all sampling events.

Additionally in Step 3, academic motivation had a marginally significant effect on PTG (B = 0.16, p = 0.060).

Marginally significant increases (tendency) ( p = 0.060) were observed for task-approach goals.

For each of these outcome measures, no significant effect of the overall time variable was seen for the whole study period, except for a marginally significant decrease in total treatment contacts ( p = 0.06) over time.

Although none of these differences were statistically significant, the difference between groups in the risk of all-cause hospitalization approached significance ( p = 0.060).

In general, higher SD SBP and ARV SBP were significantly associated with lower mean levels of serum AST and ALT, except a borderline significant association between ARV SBP and mean levels of serum ALT ( p = 0.06).

The differences between means in the education variable were near significance ( p = 0.06).