Barely Significant
← all phrases

“narrowly missed significance”

113 sentences · 113 papers · 137 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.051

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

narrowly missed significancep = 0.020.4× alphagold
Moderate deficiency (10–20) showed a strong trend toward worse OS that narrowly missed significance. Liver metastasis was independently associated with significantly worse OS (adjusted HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.06–1.91, p = 0.02), consistent with published literature where HRs for liver metastasis typically range from 1.4 to 2.0.
narrowly missed significanceP = .0511.0× alphagold
Neurodisability scale scores differed significantly across treatment response groups following prednisolone therapy ( P = .01), and post-hoc comparisons suggested a trend toward lower scores in complete responders compared to partial and nonresponders, although these differences narrowly missed significance after Bonferroni correction ( P = .051 and P = .053).
narrowly missed significancep = 0.0511.0× alphagold
A small ( N = 31) prospective, single-arm, 24-month study using ranibizumab for the treatment of retinal angiomatous proliferation (RAP) also identified a negative correlation between age at baseline and final best-corrected VA (BCVA; R = −0.357, p = 0.049, Spearman's rho test), although when analyzed using multiple linear regression analysis it narrowly missed significance ( p = 0.051) [ 19 ].
narrowly missed significancep = 0.0511.0× alphagold
Although the OS difference in the overall OPTiM population narrowly missed significance ( p = 0.051) file-(Ref) [ 43 ], a pre-specified subgroup analysis of patients with earlier-stage metastatic disease showed a marked survival benefit: in stage IIIB–IVM1a melanoma, median OS was 41.1 months with intralesional T-VEC vs. 21.5 months with GM-CSF (HR 0.57, p < 0.001) [ 75 ].
narrowly missed significancep = 0.0521.0× alphagold
Second, for the employee perspective, health deterioration moderated the relationship between staff care and disclosure intentions (study 1: B = −0.27, SE = 0.12, t = −2.30, p = 0.023, see Table S1 ), but narrowly missed significance for actual disclosure (study 2: B = 0.18, SE = 0.09, t = 1.95, p = 0.052, see Table S1 and Figure S1 ).