Excerpts

Additionally in Step 3, academic motivation had a marginally significant effect on PTG (B = 0.16, p = 0.060).

Moreover, a clear trend toward worse sexual satisfaction was observed in this group of patients (domain V; FSFI; p = 0.06).

However, we found only limited evidence of a dose-response truth® effect on openness to smoking as the difference in the effect between high and medium truth® recall was only marginally significant (p=0.06).

The intervention and time interaction showed marginal significance (F(1, 139) = 3.51, p = 0.06), suggesting a somewhat different effect of the two interventions for all groups.

Although not reaching full statistical significance, there was a notable difference of opinion on the effect of smoke between males and females in these three conditions, approaching significance ( p = 0.06 by the Chi-square test). 3.7.

A marginally significant difference between groups was found in Anger Expression-In (F 2,148 = 2.94; p = 0.06; pƞ 2 = 0.04), with Extreme Dippers showing higher scores than both Dippers (F 1,148 = 4.52; p = 0.03; pƞ 2 = 0.03) and Non-Dippers (F 1,148 = 4.53; p = 0.04; pƞ 2 = 0.03); no differences were found between Dippers and Non-Dippers (F 1,148 < 1; p = 0.82).

Significant effects were observed exclusively for somatization (Δ = 3.6; p < 0.05), together with a strong trend for anxiety symptoms (Δ = 2.6; p = 0.06) in the BSI-18 questionnaire.

The individuals with the family history of chronic diseases had BP checked more frequently; however, the results were of borderline significance (OR = 1.3; p = 0.06).

The overall F-test was marginally significant ( p = 0.06).

The interaction between company type and target audience was marginally significant for number of facings, F (2, 202) = 2.9, p = 0.06.

Perceived online social support did not have a strong direct effect on the drive for thinness, though the effect was weak and marginally significant (β = −0.11, p = 0.06; CI = −0.61; 0.01).

As summarized in Figure 4 , at three months, 25.0% of FDRs in the high-intensity arm reported getting a mammogram since study enrollment, compared with 7.9% in the low-intensity arm, although the difference was only approaching significance ( p = 0.06).

The Externalizing Problems Domain Summary approached significance ( p = 0.06) following the intervention period (see Table 5 ).

These associations reached statistical significance in one group (Spearman correlation, rho = –0.234, p = 0.04) and borderline significance in the other (Spearman correlation, rho = –0.199, p = 0.06).

53.67 nmol/L, respectively), and the difference just failed to reach statistical significance ( p = 0.060) ( Table 2 ).

When exploring within-group correlations, depressed mothers continued to show no correlation between perceived and observed interaction quality, r (43) = −0.13, p = 0.40, while the correlation for mothers in the control group approached significance in the expected direction r (24) = −0.38, p = 0.06 (higher reported dysfunctional interaction associated with lower dyadic interaction quality). 3.4.

Importantly, the interaction between purchase decision response and green product type was marginally significant, F (1, 34) = 3.79, p = 0.060, η p 2 = 0.10.

Pinch strength As the forest plot in Figure 9 shows, iontophoresis showed a trend to be less effective than phonophoresis in improving pinch strength, but the pooled results did not indicate differences between interventions (MD = −2.05 ( p = 0.06); 95% CI (−4.39 to 0.29); I 2 = 0% and Tau 2 = 0).

As well, full-time student status yielded significantly better scores in 2017 ( p < 0.001), and nearly significant ( p = 0.06) in 2022.

However, when measuring differences in the CHO intake between genders in each climbing level, marginally significant differences were found in the intermediate ( p = 0.06; Z = −1.88) and the elite ( p = 0.06; Z = −1.88) group, with no significance in the advanced group ( p = 0.13; Z = −1.50) The dietary intake of macro and micronutrients of male and female climbers on different climbing levels is presented in Table 4 .

Although the variation in practice across grades was only marginally significant ( p = 0.06), Grade 9 learners reported the highest level of hygiene practice (M = 0.54), indicating a possible trend.

No significant difference was observed in the prevalence of PDM in the participants with different ages, marital statuses, or education levels; a borderline significant difference was observed between genders, with a female predominance ( p = 0.06) ( Table 1 ). 3.2.

The difference in scores for mental health approached significance (F = 2.488, P = 0.06), while there were no significant differences in resilience (F = 1.389, P = 0.25) among the students of the four disciplines.

SES differences were less pronounced upon stratification, with trend tests significant only among females ( p = 0.004), and marginally significant among Hispanic males ( p = 0.06).

As demonstrated in Table 4 , Model 1 (without moderators) highlights that PA parenting practices were significantly associated with adolescents’ self-report of MVPA and that there was a trend towards significance ( p = 0.06) with adolescents’ MVPA measured by accelerometry.