Barely Significant

Excerpts

3,842 sentences · 1 filter applied

a trend towards significancep = 0.0881.8× alpha
Twelve variable regression for the need for any invasive treatment showed statistical significance for left joint effusion (p = 0.021), left disc displacement (p = 0.020), and left condyle degeneration (p = 0.013), as well as a trend towards significance for left disc recapture (p = 0.088). 4 Discussion A bilateral composite TMJ internal derangement score (TIDS) greater than 6 was found to have a statistically significant correlation with severity of TMJ pathology, as evidenced by the requirement for bilateral invasive treatment or any invasive treatment.
marginally significantp = 0.091.8× alphagold
In any case, our data indicate that with exception of the VIQ, the active duration of the disease had a marginally significant effect on both the FSIQ (p = 0.09) and the PIQ (p = 0.08), with longer active duration being associated with lower scores, as already emerged in previous research [ 24 ].
marginal significancep < .0901.8× alphagold
Results show that the drawings were not statistically different in size for the three measures computed: for “Me” height (M = 189.55, SD = 1389.92), t (87) = 1.279, p < .204; “Me” waist (M = 27.12, SD = 147.31), marginal significance t (86) = 1.117, p < .090; and “Me” width (M = 4.61, SD = 453.99), marginal significance t (86) = .095, p < .925.
a trend towards significancep = 0.0931.9× alpha
Additionally, there was a trend towards significance for the following correlations in males compared to females. - Horizontal jump with whole body PhA (p = 0.093, z = −1.68) and whole body LMI (p = 0.094, z = −1.68). - CMJ height (p = 0.088, z = −1.70), take-off force (p = 0.088, z = −1.70), and maximum concentric power (p = 0.069, z = −1.82) with w
near significancep < .102.0× alphagold
- We can speak of a near significance (p < .10) with a moderate effect (R 2 = 0.052) in the absolute preference of the least attractive woman, where the results point to a greater preference for the protrusive profile among those who use the nets little/not at all (50%) and towards the retrusive profile among those who use them medium/
very close to significancep < .102.0× alpha
Very close to significance (p < .10) with a moderate effect (R2 = 0.050) was the absolute preference variable of the less attractive woman, which can be explained by a greater tendency of Facebook users towards the retrusive profile (76% vs. 54.7%). - SnapChat®: Statistical significance (p < .05) with a moderate effect (R 2 = 0.042) was found in the relative preference for the female silhouette, which is due to the greater choice of users of this network for the protrusive profile (81.1%).