Excerpts

The level of prosodic boundaries achieved marginal significance (χ 2 = 9.91, p = .07).

For P22, the HIMB group still slightly increased, while the control group showed a decrease making both groups difference nearly significant (p = 0.0720). 3.3.3.

The relationship between the lesion's cross-section and the opposite edge of the rectum showed marginal significance ( P = 0.072, OR: 7.500, 95 % CI: 0.759–74.157).

An independent samples t -test showed that the difference between beginners and intermediate learners from native speakers was marginally significant; beginners tended to be less native-like than intermediate learners ( t (10.041) = 2.003, p = .073).

When we examined DIY and commercial PACs separately, in the wildfire study, we observed a borderline significant decline in mental health in relation to DIY PAC usage (β = −0.26, 95 % CI: 0.55, 0.02, p = 0.073), and physical and all-cause health symptom scores were not significantly associated with usage ( Table S3 ).

For the parietal region, the regression model (F (16) = 2.291, p = .038) of hierarchical regression analyses revealed significant interaction effect between low-band alpha asymmetry index at P5-P6 and HF ( β = .485; p = .018), and marginally significant interactions between low-band alpha asymmetry index at P3-P4 and LF/HF ( β = -.419; p = .074) and P5-P6 and LF/HF ( β = .412; p = .072) on the BDI score for MDD patients ( Table 2 , Fig. 1 ).

Assignment 3 showed a positive trend (p = 0.074), hinting at a potential impact of NPCs that approached but did not reach conventional levels of statistical significance.

Receiving additional psychotherapy showed a trend toward significance ( p = .075) such that the participants who received additional psychotherapy had a higher BDI-II sum score at t1. 3.3 Research question 2 A repeated-measures ANOVA with a Greenhouse-Geisser correction demonstrated that for both groups, the mean performance levels differed significantly between measurements; intervention group: F (2.29, 107.35) = 11.89, p < .001, partial η 2 = .20, and waitlist group: F (2.58, 123.69) = 13.78, p < .001, partial η 2 = .22.

The peptides also showed a near-significant interaction effect at POD 1 and POD 7 ( P = 0.075 and P = 0.053, respectively) ( Figure 1 B).

However, post-hoc multiple comparisons revealed only marginally significant differences for −250 ms SOA (96 % correct) and 0 ms SOA (97.4 correct), p = 0.075.

The HF power spectrum did not change in any period in SC horses, although it showed a trend to decrease during P1-rd ( P = 0.0761) and P2-rd ( P = 0.0789).

The number of all emerged adults and females was slightly higher on caterpillars fed on R+ plants than those fed on R-plants, but the differences were marginally non-significant (adults: χ 2 (1) = 3.13, P = 0.077; females: χ 2 (1) = 3.68, P = 0.055; Fig. 4 A).

On the other hand, plant height showed a mild trend of decrease uphill (Jonckheere-Terpstra Test, Z = -1.424, p = 0.077, n = 444 stems).

However, knot strength showed a trend in differences between genders (p = 0.077), with a higher knot strength in those made by males.

Although no statistically significant differences were found in the analysis of survival and antibiotic exposure, there was a clear trend toward longer survival in patients who did not require antibiotic treatment (mOS 23 months for non-use vs 12 months for use of antibiotics; p = 0.078).

In contrast, women reporting higher levels of financial stress had lower levels of 6,12 channel F2-isoprostanes (β = −0.05, SE = 0.02, p = 0.007) and this borderline significant association was comparable in African American women (β = −0.06, SE = 0.03, p = 0.079) and Whites (β = −0.05, SE = 0.02, p = 0.050) ( Table 3 ).

In contrast to that in the control valley, the linear regression calculated from 1998 to 2017 showed a negative trend (β = –10.06; R 2 = 0.16; p = 0.07965).

Of these, PEU was statistically significant for attitudes but it was approaching significance (p = .08) for willingness to get implants.

As Table 3 shows, no other main effects or interactions were significant or showed a trend towards significance, except a trend (not Bonferroni-corrected) of overall higher scores for the incongruent base rate vignettes scores in Group 1 compared to Group 2, p = .08.

IgG titers to HCoV-NL63 showed an increasing trend between the PPC and HC 2021 groups (p = 0.08), but this was not significantly different.

Additionally, a near-significant difference was observed for the residual tumor status (p = 0.082) and adjacent hepatic tissue inflammation (p = 0.076), suggesting potential trends that warrant further investigation.

Instead, only death and losses were significantly associated with a high level of self-reported depressive symptoms (β = .12, t (372) = 2.35, p = .02), although step II was only marginally significant [increase in R 2 = .02; F (3,372) = 2.29, p = .082], indicating cautiousness of interpretation.

This finding was marginally significant in both crude (IRR: 1.004; p = 0.083) and adjusted analysis (aIRR: 1.004; p = 0.103).

FA also showed a marginally significant positive effect (B = 0.477, SE = 0.277, p = 0.085) (odds ratio = 1.611, 95 % confidence interval = [0.936, 2.773]).

HbA1c percentage indicated a negative trend (B = −0.03, SE = 0.02; Beta = −0.17; t = −1.70, p = 0.085), but this was not statistically significant.