Excerpts

All measures assessing the same ability were significantly positively intercorrelated, except for the linguistic accuracy scores (although the correlation between the verbal fluency and lexical decision task was marginally significant: p = 0.051, r = 0.20), linguistic speed scores (for which the correlation was negative), and the flanker and Simon inhibition scores.

Conscientiousness predicted connectedness to self ( F (1, 368) = 5.67, p = 0.018, η 2 = 0.012) and approached significance for connectedness to world/spirituality ( F (1, 368) = 3.85, p = 0.051, η 2 = 0.008).

Further, 3-year-old girls learned more words when they dragged the named objects ( M = 3.98, SE = 0.38) than when they simply watched the objects move without interacting with the screen ( M = 2.78, SE = 0.30), although this 1.20-word difference was only marginally significant, 95% CI [-0.003, 2.41], p = 0.051.

There were additional marginally significant indirect effects on child’s self-regulation (β = 0.03, p = 0.051) and receptive vocabulary (β = 0.03, p = 0.072) through the frequency of shared activities.

The interaction of time x basepower showed a trend ( F 3, 75 = 2.703, p = 0.051, η2 = 0.098), while the factor group ( F 1, 25 = 0.931, p = 0.344, η2 = 0.036) and the interaction time x mismatch did not reach significance ( F 3, 75 = 1.478, p = 0.227, η2 = 0.056).

According to the reduced model the proportion of L2 speakers had an inverse and borderline significant effect on the degree of inflectional synthesis (log(λ) = −0.398 ± 0.21; χ 2 (1) = 3.798; p = 0.051).

The interaction between number format and CRI [ F (1,116) = 0.85, p = 0.359, ηp2 = 0.01] and between number format and education [ F (1,116) = 0.41, p = 0.526, ηp2 = 0.00] did not reach significance, while the interaction between number format and age was marginally non-significant [ F (1,116) = 3.90, p = 0.051, ηp2 = 0.03].

The highest foreign language score ( β = 0.154, p < 0.001) and whether they had participated in intercultural training ( β = 0.110, p = 0.008) remained significant, while the influence of education status approached significance ( β = 0.085, p = 0.051).

A paired samples t -test showed that there was a marginally significant difference ( t = -2.024, df = 35, p = 0.051) in the difference in pitch range (Tones 4 – 1) between IDS (mean = 97.724 Hz, sd = 75.934) and ADS (mean = 66.987 Hz, sd = 60.927).

In addition, there was a main effect for mode-of-thought [ F (1,96)=6.24, p <0.05], as well as a marginally significant order × mode-of-thought interaction [ F (5,92)=2.31, p=0 .051].

The use of explanations had a near-significant, positive relation to infant age, D (1) = 3.82, p = 0.051.

Per protocol (PP) analysis Results from 3 × 4 mixed ANOVA revealed significant treatment-by-time interaction effects for all variables analysed, with the exception of behaviour activation, which nevertheless reached a marginally significant level ( p = 0.051) ( Table 8 ).

Levene’s test was close to significance ( p = 0.051), indicating slightly higher variance in the patients’ group.

Planned tests showed that the close condition differed significantly from the unrelated condition in the analysis by participants, t 1(63) = 2.16, p = 0.034, and just failed to reach significance by items, t 2(15) = 2.12, p = 0.051.

Univariate analyses confirmed the influence of conformity for two of the three aspects of coherence, F (1,87) = 5.20, p = 0.002, η 2 = 0.056 for temporal coherence, F (1,87) = 10.29, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.106 for causal-motivational coherence, and a clear trend for thematic coherence, F (1,87) = 3.87, p = 0.051, η 2 = 0.043.

And also showed a marginally significant ( p = 0.051) effect on learning.

The relationship for Black suspects just missed significance ( p = 0.051).

There was also a main effect of TYPE in the subjects [ F 1(1, 20) = 19.23, p < 0.001] and items [ F 2(1, 39) = 28.9] analyses and an interaction between TYPE and DISTANCE that was approaching significance in the subjects [ F 1(2, 40) = 3.22, p < 0.051], but not the items [ F 2(2, 78) = 1.85, p = 0.164] analysis.

The results show a marginally significant negative effect of health literacy on beliefs in myths (a1: β = −0.064, p = 0.051, CI [−0.128, 0.000]).

The same pattern was found for high probability targets (19.5%, 95% CI [15.3,24.5]), and this is marginally significant ( p = 0.051).

This effect of framing condition was qualified by a marginally significant interaction between framing condition and age [ X 2 (2)=5.93, p =0.051]; specifically, the effect of the Extrinsic framing condition relative to the Neutral framing condition grew significantly less strong over development [ b =1.92, SE =0.88, 95% CI (0.19, 3.66), p =0.03], but no such age-related change was observed in the effect of the Intrinsic framing condition relative to the Neutral framing condition ( p =0.82).

In addition, we noted that in the regression predicting DTS, the negative association between the use of sedatives and DTS was only marginally insignificant ( p = 0.051) ( Table 4, Panel F ).

A main effect of congruency was found, F (1,57) = 102.6, MSE = 64,955, p < 0.001, a marginally significant effect was found for group, F (2,57) = 2.64, MSE = 37,202, p = 0.051, and no significant interaction effect was found, F < 1.

A T-test was performed, finding with marginal significance longer RTs for congruent ( M = 2.331 s, SD = 0.752) compared to incongruent ( M = 2.041 s, SD = 0.471) trials, t (31) = -2.03, p = 0.051.

For men, two-way ANOVA analysis did not show clearly significant results between PRE and POST salivary OXT level, in either the “social positive” vs “social negative” sample [ F (1, 7) = 5.564, p = 0.051] ( Supplementary Figure S5B ), or in the “social positive” vs “non-social” sample [ F (1, 21) = 0.029, p = 0.865] ( Supplementary Figure S5D ).