Excerpts

There was a marginally significant main effect of language, F (1,70) = 2.94, p = 0.09, η p 2 = 0.04, suggesting the English-speaking children ( M = 0.40, SD = 1.96) were more likely to imitated the demonstrated manner versus the path.

Additional results Narrative coherence at T2 was found to have a marginally significant, small to moderate negative correlation to familial risk factors ( β = −0.18, p = 0.09).

A Univariate ANOVA with number of target responses as the dependent measure, number of models as a fixed factor and age as a covariate produced a main effect for age [ F (2,72) = 6.81, p = 0.01, η 2 = 0.90] and a marginally significant effect for number of models [ F (2,72) = 2.50, p = 0.09, η 2 = 0.70].

Two other variables narrowly missed significance: those who were less religious (β = −0.15, t = −1.70, p = 0.09) and those who were less Open-to-Experience (β = −0.16, t = 1.78, p = 0.07) endorsed the idea of commercial conspiracies.

AON AON analyses demonstrated a marginal trend for the effect of movement intensity, F (2, 58) = 2.42, p = 0.09.

The mean reaction time in the test of visual rapid simultaneous processing was negatively correlated with the reading speed in both oral [ r = -0.29, p = 0.09, marginally significant] and silent [ r = -0.45, p = 0.001] modes, where shorter reaction time for visual rapid simultaneous processing corresponded to higher speed of reading.

The final step also showed a trend toward a two-way interaction between mindfulness and eating disorder cognition (β = -0.16, p = 0.09; Step 3 R 2 Δ = 0.03, p = 0.09).

Push) ANOVA indicated a marginally significant Two-Way interaction [ F (1, 49) = 2.93, p = 0.09, η 2 p = 0.057]: Pulling the lever with positive words was a little faster [ t (49) = 1.054, p = 0.297.] than pushing, whereas pulling the lever with negative words [ t (49) = 1.742, p = 0.088] was slower than pushing.

The difference in depression scores between the two groups was marginally significant [ t (71) = 1.72, p = 0.09], with greater depression scores exhibited in the HP group than in the LP group ( Table 1 ).

The combined group showed a trend of improvement on TMT-A (combined vs. control, p = 0.09) while memory group did not.

7 A follow-up analysis revealed the purchase x attitude x argument quality interaction was marginally significant b = 0.08 SE = 0.05, t (226) = 10.72, p = 0.09, 95% CI [−0.01, 0.17].

The relationship between interoceptive awareness and emotional involvement during reappraisal approached significance [β = -0.34, t (25) = -1.73, p = 0.09].

However, the results reveal that this interaction reaches only marginal significance, F (1, 214) = 2.91, p = 0.090.

In the N400 time window, the global ANCOVA showed a marginally significant main effect of Condition [ F (1,43) = 3.03, p = 0.09], but no significant main effect of Group ( F < 1).

Further exploratory decomposition revealed a significant time by condition interaction in the 10-min duration group [ F (1,13) = 13.56, p = 0.003, η 2 = 0.51] and an interaction approaching significance in the 30-min duration group [ F (1,16) = 3.19, p = 0.09, η 2 = 0.17].

A medium effect, albeit of marginal significance, in favor of the UT group immediately after the training was found for two far transfer tasks: story recall, F (1,39) = 3.09, p = 0.09, MSE = 11.04, η p 2 = 0.07, and RAPM, F (1,39) = 2.73, p = 0.10, MSE = 4.27, η p 2 = 0.07 ( Figure 5 ).

The overall model for emotion to gender switching was marginally significant [ R 2 = 0.24, adjusted R 2 = 0.10, F (15,75) = 1.581, p = 0.09].

An association with the putting into perspective dimension of the CERQ reached marginal significance (β = 5.6441, p = 0.09).

There was a marginally significant difference in the general participation preference between the two cultural groups [β = 0.14, t (340) = 1.72, p = 0.09, d = 0.19].

Pairwise comparison between left and right ATR groups showed a trend for pleasant odors ( p = 0.09) but not for unpleasant odors ( p = 0.21).

Importantly, a marginally significant interaction effect was found, b = 0.44, p = 0.09.

The result for the mother communication × grade (age) × gender interaction variable was marginally significant ( B = 0.086, SE = 0.051, t = 1.69, p = 0.090, 95% CI = [−0.014, 0.185]).

For negative affect, there was no main effect of Time, F < 1, and a marginally significant Condition × Time interaction, F (1,218) = 2.93, p = 0.09, η p 2 = 0.01.

This pattern was marginally significant, F (1,57) = 2.96, p = 0.091, η p 2 = 0.025, suggesting that Japanese speakers may apply the visual-based strategy to the similarity judgment better than English speakers.

In the restricted cubic spline regression, the intercept term for age reached significance ( p = 0.014), and its linear term approached significance ( p = 0.091).