Barely Significant

Excerpts

4,234 sentences · 1 filter applied

marginally significantp = 0.0561.1× alphagold
A marginally significant difference was found for Affective Value between these participant groups (z = 1.91, p = 0.056, two-tailed; drop: X = 6.3 ± 0.3; no drop: X = 5.7 ± 0.2), while no difference was observed for Purposeful Intent (z = 0.85, p = 0.395, two-tailed; drop: X = 6.3 ± 0.2; no drop: X = 6.1 ± 0.1).
a strong trendp = 0.0581.2× alphagold
In terms of protein denaturation, there was a strong trend that the fillet muscle samples from 20L:4D and 16L:8D had a higher transmission than the samples from 18L:6D and 12L:12D groups ( p = 0.058), indicating a higher degree of denaturation in the sarcoplasmic protein in those samples.
approached significancep = 0.0601.2× alpha
For textural properties, nitrite level (Pillai’s Trace = 0.25, F(7,82) = 4.0, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.25) and heat treatment (Pillai’s Trace = 0.16, F(7,82) = 2.3, p = 0.040, η 2 = 0.16) were significantly associated with variation, while the effect of salt approached significance ( p = 0.060).
approached significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
Numerically, the Tender genotype consistently scored superior to the Tough genotype, although the difference was only significant for Sensory Location 1, where the Tender genotype scored higher for tenderness, juiciness and flavour; the difference approached significant ( p = 0.06) for chewiness in Sensory Location 2. 4.
an increasing trendp = 0.061.2× alphagold
For Enterobacteriaceae , data show a reduction in the final value in the AP and P, while no significant differences were highlighted for λ and μmax; however, an increasing trend was recorded for λ and a decreasing one was noted for μmax ( p = 0.06 and p = 0.056, respectively, data not shown).