A borderline significant and positive correlation was also observed between PFI scores and HDL-C ( r = 0.13; p = 0.06).
Excerpts
borderline non-significantP = 0.060
For overall IBD, the continuous LC9 score was significantly associated with reduced IBD risk in Models 1 and 2 (Model 1: HR 0.956, 95% CI 0.934–0.979, P < 0.001; Model 2: HR 0.960, 95% CI 0.937–0.983, P = 0.001), while the association in Model 3 was attenuated and borderline non-significant (HR 0.976, 95% CI 0.953–1.001, P = 0.060).
borderline significancep = 0.06
3.67, respectively, p = 0.03), but borderline significance on the educational and peer subscales ( p = 0.06 for both).
approached significanceP = 0.06
A notable finding of this study is that subgroup analysis approached significance( P = 0.06), suggesting that short-interval HIIT may be more effective in reducing BF% compared to long-interval HIIT, which is consistent with findings from previous studies [ 53 ].
borderline non-significantp = 0.06
The values reflected for females was borderline non-significant (−0.11, CI −0.22–0.006, p = 0.06).
approached significancep = 0.06
The latter study also used a comparison group (a group of ECE centers in North Carolina, a state that did not make any policy changes) and reported a state-by-time interaction term which approached significance ( p = 0.06).
approached significancep = 0.06
However, the association between the sleep hygiene term and PSQI approached significance ( p = 0.06).
Partial mediation may be present since pathway c’ indicates a borderline significant relationship ( B = -0.45 ( p = 0.06)).
borderline significancep = 0.06
Together with the borderline significance ( p = 0.06) for PA on LBP in stratified analysis for females it is tempting to indicate a relationship.
It was marginally significant at the medium price ( p = 0.06, not represented in Fig. 2 ).
borderline significancep = 0.060
In that study, after adjusting for socio-demographic factors, the association between IPV perpetration and depression was attenuated to borderline significance (OR 3.7 95% CI: 1.0, 14.6; p = 0.060 ).
As far as the differences in HCV seropositivities between index cases and their contacts is concerned, there was no significant different pattern in risk factors, with only blood transfusions approaching significance (26% in HCV patients vs. 4.8% in their contacts; p = 0.06).
[ 27 ] found a borderline significant positive association (P= 0.06) between job demands and increased BMI.
Firstly providers who intended to discuss risk factors prior to the consultation were more likely to assess for all lifestyle risk factors (approaching significance, P = 0.06, OR = 1.70, CI = 0.97–2.97, Model 2).
In model 2-Direct Effects-BMI adj , BMI was added, resulting in a slight decrease in the effect size (OR adj = 1.10; 95% CI 1.00, 1.22) between ACE and T2DM and a reduction from significance to marginal significance ( p = 0.06).
In girls, the OR for the “strongly agree” category was very close to statistical significance ( P = 0.06), underlying a loss of statistical power in stratified analysis.
approached significancep = .06
Gender approached significance (β = −0.98 ± 0.51; p = .06), and was retained in the model to account for possible population differences between boys’ and girls’ activity (Figure 1 ).
just missed significancep = 0.06
Differences in caregiver impairment across orphan status just missed significance (p = 0.06), but suggest that caregiver impairment may be more common among caregivers of orphans rather than non-orphans in this sample.
very close to significancep = 0.06
Poverty threshold was very close to significance ( p = 0.06) in the final model.
approached significancep = 0.06
Yet, in the longitudinal model the only variable that approached significance was mother’s country of birth, where being U.S. born was associated with a 2.10-point increase in opportunities from school-year to summer ( p = 0.06) after adjusting for covariates.
We repeated this analysis by disclosure status and found borderline significant improvement in the caregivers of disclosed children ( p = 0.06) but not in the caregivers of undisclosed children ( p = 0.16).
approached significanceP = 0.06
The result for serious mental illness approached significance ( P = 0.06).
marginally non-significantp = 0.06
There was a very small and marginally non-significant, negative effect of the time that had elapsed since screening (slope -0.003, p = 0.06).
close to significancep = 0.06
The interaction between openness with family/friends and HIV partner disclosure was close to significance ( p = 0.06).
reported that, among patients, having family members infected by SARS was a marginally significant predictive factor ( p = 0.06) of having psychotic disorder during the treatment phase [ 20 ].