Barely Significant
← all phrases

“did not reach statistical significance”

111,028 sentences · 111,028 papers · 130,054 search hits before verification

In the literature

While the difference in post-test total scores between groups did not reach statistical significance, both groups demonstrated a significant gain in total knowledge following the FSL with moderate effect sizes (TG: p < 0.05, r = 0.37; IG: p < 0.005, r = 0.47) (Table 4 ).
Additionally, providers 5 to 10 years after completion of training had a trend toward higher average number of PrEP prescriptions prescribed in the past 6 months (1.7) in comparison to those less than 5 years after training (1.3) and over 10 years from training (1.4), although the difference did not reach statistical significance ( P < .05).
At a low level of O 2 , the photorespiration rate (P r ) and the ratio of photorespiration/gross photosynthetic rate (P r /P g ) in seedling leaves were lower than in sapling leaves when both were exposed to 1,200 μmol·m −2 ·s −1 PFD, but this difference did not reach statistical significance ( P < 0.05).
However, the post-hoc tests concerning the comparison of the groups with respect to body mass did not reach statistical significance although the difference between naMCI and HC was marginally non-significant (W ( n naMCI = 21, n HC = 27) = −3.310, p = 0.051).
almost significantp = 0.0511.0× alphagold
did not reach statistical significancep = 0.1122.2× alphaplainly factual
This effect remained significant for r = 0.9 (SMD = 0.52, p = 0.032) or almost significant for 0.5 (SMD = 0.26, p = 0.051), but differences did not reach statistical significance for r =0.2 (SMD = 0.21, p = 0.112).
Comparing the STAI scores in study subjects and controls, results on both subscales (STAI-S and STAI-T) were higher in the study group; however, the difference did not reach statistical significance, although the results of STAI-S scores were marginally significant ( P = 0.051).
a trend towards significanceP = .0511.0× alpha
did not reach statistical significanceP = .0511.0× alphaplainly factual
Specifically, a significant increase in male overall SSB consumption trends over the 16 year time period was observed ( P = .048 for trend analysis); although the differences in male overall SSB consumption between NHANES III versus NHANES 1999–2004 did not reach statistical significance when the data were analyzed in aggregate, the analysis suggested a trend towards significance ( P = .051).
In addition, pre-menopausal women with obesity showed a significantly higher chance to have an intermediate chronotype (OR = 2.21, 95% CI 1.28–3.83; p = 0.004), whereas post-menopausal women with obesity showed a trend to have a higher morning chronotype (OR = 1.42, 95% CI 0.98–2.06; p = 0.051), although this did not reach statistical significance.
While the difference in red blood cell (RBC) transfusion rates approached significance, with 68.8% of the CPCT group and 56.3% of the TEG group receiving RBC transfusions ( P = 0.051), it did not reach statistical significance.
did not reach statistical significancep = 0.0511.0× alphaplainly factual
showed a trendp = 0.0511.0× alpha
In contrast, although patients with high miR-1321 expression showed a trend towards decreased overall survival, this association did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.051), Overall, these findings indicate that increased expression of specific miRNAs is associated with unfavorable prognoses in glioma patients ( Figure 5 ). 4.