Barely Significant
← all phrases

“did not reach statistical significance”

111,028 sentences · 111,028 papers · 130,054 search hits before verification

In the literature

did not reach statistical significanceP = 0.1172.3× alphaplainly factual
To the right of the threshold, although a negative trend was observed between serum uric acid levels and femoral neck BMD, it did not reach statistical significance ( β = −0.000, 95% CI : −0.002 to 0.000, P = 0.117) ( Table 4 ).
The results of the meta-analysis were consistent with these findings, with an overall trend toward greater SAF in smokers than in non-smokers for similar age groups, but the difference did not reach statistical significance ( Supplementary Table S7 , Figure S9 ).
The expression of monocyte chemotactic protein 1(MCP-1) and regulated upon activation normal T-cell expressed and presumably secreted (RANTES) was significantly increased in the aortas of KO mice, and that of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) showed a trend of increase in KO mice although did not reach statistical significance ( Fig. 2 G).
did not reach statistical significancep = 0.132.6× alphaplainly factual
The intensity of GLuc luminescence in rat blood tends to be higher in the IPP (+) group [IPP (−) vs IPP (+) (AU); 2600 ± 224 vs 2824 ± 241, p = 0.13, Cohen’s d = 0.96]: Although the difference did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.13), the large effect size in the animal experience (Cohen’s d = 0.96) suggests a notable trend (Fig. 7j ).
It is of note that, among the MASLD cohort, there was an overall trend of consuming more refined grains (refined wheat: 0.69 ± 0.99 vs 0.66 ± 0.39 g/kg/d; refined rice: 0.19 ± 0.02 vs 0.13 ± 0.11 g/kg/d) compared with whole grains (wholegrain wheat: 0.23 ± 0.3 vs 0.31 ± 0.34 g/kg/d; wholegrain rice: 0.04 ± 0.12 vs 0.03 ± 0.05 g/kg/d), but the differences did not reach statistical significance.
did not reach statistical significancep = 0.0691.4× alphaplainly factual
The post hoc analysis indicated that the LE group demonstrated significantly elevated Sirt1 expression compared to the HE group ( Figure 8 A, p < 0.001) and showed a trend toward elevated expression relative to the CE group, though this difference did not reach statistical significance ( Figure 8 A, p = 0.069).
In the subsequent years, a segment with a decreasing trend was identified during 2007–2017 with an APC of -10.6 (95% CI, -13.6 - -7.6; p = < 0.001) and another segment with an increasing trend during 2017–2021 with an APC of 7.2 (95% CI, -6.2–22.5), although the latter did not reach statistical significance as indicated by the confidence interval.