Excerpts

hyaena (p = 0.062, p = 0.102, respectively) identify marginally significant differences in dietary behavior (all p-values ≤ 0.10).

Third, we created multivariable models adjusted for factors with statistical significance ( p < 0.050) or marginal significance (0.050 ≤ p < 0.100) in comparison analyses, in addition to sex, age, and body mass index.

With respect to the changes of miRNAs we also report on results with a tendency towards significance, i.e. p < 0.10.

Factors with a trend towards significance (p < 0.10) were included in a multivariable regression analysis.

For men, the two-way interaction term (depressive symptoms × brokerage) predicting adjusted left hippocampal volume was marginally significant ( p = 0.10).

2 , with * indicating a p value < 0.05 and ¶ indicating marginal significance (0.05 ≤ p < 0.1) for comparisons of the no-DR, NPDR, and PDR groups with the control group.

The multivariate analysis was adjusted to include clinically significant variables (age ≥ 65, gender, Shock index > 1, active bleeding, and endoscopic ligation) and variables with at least borderline significance ( P < 0.10) in univariate analysis.

Meanwhile, the effect of R&D investment on firm value is only marginally significant (Model 4, coefficient: 0.124, p < 0.1).

Visual acuity as determined by the VEP technique was similar between the genotypes at 2 months of age, but showed a trend towards decline in CLN5 deficient mice at 6 months of age (interaction: F 1,20 = 3.00, p = 0.10, Fig. 1I ).

7b , at least 50% of the pairs of functional subcategories in each major categories showed significant (p < 0.05) or marginally significant (p < 0.1) correlations, with coefficients above 0.25.

A statistical significance between comparisons was defined when P ≤ 0.05 and a statistical trend was defined as 0.05 < P ≤ 0.10.

The significance level was set at P < 0.05 and t indicated a statistical trend (0.05 < P < 0.10).

Thus, the correlation is significant and marginally significant (i.e. 0.05 ≤ p < 0.10) at these two site.

We also report on main effects with borderline significance ( p < 0.10) to show trends that may additionally help pattern recognition of a brain-hemostasis cross-talk.

The GLMM showed a borderline significant difference between the two groups for the cotinine verified parental report of PS (p<0.10), and a significant difference between the two groups for the un verified parental report of PS (p<0.05).

No patient had a significant local effect, one patient showed a trend of a local effect (0.05 < p < 0.1; MCS patient #13) and did not regain consciousness.

When building a logistic regression model, the variables with borderline significance between the sexes at baseline (P ≤ 0.1: age, hypertension, NIHSS of 0 at baseline) were independent risk factors for poor functional outcome (P = 0.001) but none of them were independent risk factors for poor social outcome.

4a ), being significant for Eif2b3 and showing a statistical trend (p < 0.1) for the other three: Med28 , Pias1 and Sirt1 (Mann-Whitney U test).

For multiple logistic analysis, we incorporated several important factors that were likely to be significant (at P < 0.1) and that avoided multicollinearity, as follows: elderly patients (> 65 years old), visit to the health care facility after 24 h, presence of fever, absence of abdominal tenderness, elevated CRP (above 10 mg/L), night shift, first visit to a teaching hospital, unavailability of urgent radiology reports, first visit to the clinic, and examination by a non-generalist.

As with unilateral AION, the rod-weighted logI 50 for both affected eyes was higher compared to control eyes but the difference did not quite reach significance (median logI 50 for better eyes = −2.40 log cd/m2, for worse eyes = −2.31 log cd/m2 compared to −2.60 log cd/m2 for control eyes, p = 0.10).

While the EPHA2 signal showed the trend towards increase upon irradiation in all compared categories (adherent HCC-44 cells, adherent A549 cells, and A549 spheroids), the increase was not statistically significant due to high variation between the experiments; in case of HCC-44, borderline significance was achieved ( P < 0.1).

However, EDV showed a trend of positive correlations with age at both 0 m and 6 m, and LVIDd and SV at 6 m only ( p < 0.1).

One study using data from four cross-sectional and longitudinal surveys from 25 European countries, Israel and the United States found that depressive symptoms were linked to reduced voting in three of the four datasets and were of near significance in the fourth (p < 0.10) 13 .

Two other SNPs, both in MAP3K5 , reached borderline significance (P < 0.1) in the replication population with similar effects as the discovery population: rs9389421 (P = 0.063) and rs13195420 (P = 0.055).

Differences were considered significant at P < 0.05 and extremely significant at P < 0.1.