Notable near-significant differences (p < 0.1) are also indicated in the figures.
Excerpts
After constructing the full model containing all the predictors listed above and their interactions, we simplified the model utilizing a stepwise backwards elimination procedure based on the significance level ( p < 0.050) of the predictors, in each step dropping the predictor with the highest p value, until reaching the minimal adequate model containing only significant or marginally significant ( p < 0.100) effects.
However, statistically significant (p-value < 0.05) or near-significant (p-value < 0.1) log-fold changes were only detected in four bacteria, all belonging to the phylum Firmicutes, and exhibiting somewhat low relative abundances in the gut microbiota of most hosts (Fig. 3 c).
showed a trendp = 0.1
In contrast, the MF females could be discriminated using Total Odour and Richness (pDFA, correctly cross-classified: 75%, expected to be correctly cross-classified: 51%, p = 0.036) and showed a trend towards being distinguishable using MDS1 and MDS2 (pDFA, correctly cross-classified: 48%, expected to be correctly cross-classified: 32%, p = 0.1).
In the distal colon content samples, the OTUs displayed a decreasing trend (0.05 ≤ P < 0.10) and Chao1 and ACE were significantly decreased ( P < 0.05) with pregnancy stage.
However, the difference was only marginally significant ( P < 0.1).
Results were considered to be statistically significant when p < 0.05 and marginally significant when 0.05 < p < 0.10.
Similarly, in Magge, one statistically significant (Gi * Z ≥ 1.96, Gi * P ≤ 0.05), and one nearly significant hotspot (Gi * Z < 1.96, Gi * P < 0.1) were identified at the northern and eastern edges of the village, respectively, in which the majority (52.6%) of the mosquitoes were collected (Fig. 2 D).
borderline significancep < 0.1
Two of the genes displayed a significant association with patient survival (p < 0.05), and one showed borderline significance (p < 0.1).
Among all 16 drugs with transporter information in DrugBank, the annotated transporters for six of them were significantly enriched (p < 0.05) in the predictive features, and three additional drugs had borderline significant enrichment (p < 0.1, Fig. 5 ).
Differences between racial groups overall were marginally statistically significant (ANOVA p values = 0.1 for group comparisons).
There were marginally significant (0.05 < P < 0.1) differences in age, sex, race, and serum levels of CRP between the two groups.
The GLMM showed a borderline significant difference between the two groups for the cotinine verified parental report of PS (p<0.10), and a significant difference between the two groups for the un verified parental report of PS (p<0.05).
The results of the model revealed a marginally significant interaction between Time and Group, b = 0.3, t (12) = 1.29, p = 0.1.
a trend toward significanceP < 0.10
Significance was defined as P < 0.05, and a trend toward significance as 0.05 < P < 0.10.
For multiple logistic analysis, we incorporated several important factors that were likely to be significant (at P < 0.1) and that avoided multicollinearity, as follows: elderly patients (> 65 years old), visit to the health care facility after 24 h, presence of fever, absence of abdominal tenderness, elevated CRP (above 10 mg/L), night shift, first visit to a teaching hospital, unavailability of urgent radiology reports, first visit to the clinic, and examination by a non-generalist.
borderline significancep < 0.10
We also report on main effects with borderline significance ( p < 0.10) to show trends that may additionally help pattern recognition of a brain-hemostasis cross-talk.
Only three bivariate linear models yielded near-significant ( p < 0.10) relationships with number of trees, and these models still yielded significance with these predictors: mean distance to nearest town ( p = 0.006; R 2 = 0.523), distance to nearest trail ( p = 0.014; R 2 = 0.476), and mean wind speed ( p = 0.006; R 2 = 0.517).
All variables which turned out to be significant or nearly significant ( p < 0.1) determinants of ODD on the univariate analysis, were included in a single multivariate logistic regression model.
Sex, height, potassium, and alanine aminotransferase had a trend nearing significance ( p < 0.1).
However, root dry weights (Rdw) in four of the inoculation treatments were significantly lower ( P ≤ 0.01) than in the control treatment, and only the inoculation with Micromonospora ALFb5 produced an increase marginally significant ( P ≤ 0.1).
At T1, the total aboveground plant dry mass was influenced by the irrigation treatment, being significantly lower in cd compared to ctr plants and slightly higher (marginal significance, p < 0.1) in cd compared to pd plants (Fig. 2A , Table 2 ).
a trend towards significancep < 0.1
Variables that showed a trend towards significance (p < 0.1) in the univariate regression were added to a step-down multivariable logistic regression model to determine independent predictors of BI.
showed a trendp = 0.10
In NMOSD we found VEP latency increasing 0.24 ± 0.07 ms for every year of age (p < 0.001, GEE), while relationship with disease duration, controlling for patient age, showed a trend for significance (+0.28 ± 0.17 ms per year, p = 0.10); no significant role for fellow eye ON status was found (p = 0.29).
approached significanceP = 0.100
For HFD versus LFD rats, GU of insulin-stimulated single fibers was significantly (P < 0.05) lower for IIA, IIAX, IIBX, IIB, and approached significance for IIX (P = 0.100), but not type I (P = 0.776) fibers.