Barely Significant

Excerpts

27,100 sentences · 1 filter applied

marginally significantp = 0.0992.0× alphagold
In the time window of the ERAN component (140–240 ms), the main effect of developmental pattern was significant, F (2, 62) = 7.246, p = 0.002, η p 2 = 0.206; the interaction between developmental pattern and anteriority was significant, F (4, 124) = 5.867, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.173; the interaction between developmental pattern and hemisphere was marginally significant, F (4, 124) = 2.001, p = 0.099, η p 2 = 0.067; the interaction between developmental pattern, hemisphere and anteriority was significant, F (8, 248) = 2.501, p = 0.013, η p 2 = 0.082; and the main effect of hemisphere and anteriority and their interaction were all significant, F s ≥ 5.234, p s < 0.001, η p 2 s ≥ 0.157.
a clear trendp = 0.0992.0× alphagold
A clear trend towards upregulation of the skin barrier proteins involucrin (IVL, 1.4-fold; p = 0.099; Fig. 2b ) and loricrin (LOR, 1.6-fold; p = 0.5218; Fig. 2c ), as well as the tight junction proteins occludin (OCLN, 1.4-fold, Fig. 2d ) and claudin-1 (CLDN-1, 1.2-fold, p = 0.036, Fig. 2e ) in FLG − compared to FLG + skin equivalents was observed, in line with previous reports from our group 13 .
marginally statistically significantP = 0.09922.0× alphagold
Marginally statistically significant associations were noted for specific deaths from ischemic heart disease (aHR = 1.44, trend test P = 0.0992) and cerebral ischemic stroke (aHR = 1.66, trend test P = 0.0667), respectively, but no significant gradient relationship was noted for death from cerebral hemorrhage stroke (aHR = 1.23, trend test, P = 0.6278).
approaching significancep < 0.12.0× alphagold
Bacterial associations at baseline A total of 18 paired species associations were marked as being found in co-occurrence at a rate different from expected by random chance (Spearman ranked correlations, p < 0.05) whereas an additional 12 species were approaching significance (Spearman ranked correlations, p < 0.1; Fig. 4 and Table 1 ).
marginally significantp = 0.102.0× alphagold
For measures of urge-tic association, individual logistic and linear regression coefficients did not differ between age groups (two-sided test: p > 0.4, one-sided tests: p > 0.2) while a marginally significant difference was found for correlation coefficients (t(38.23) = − 1.69, two-sided test: p = 0.10, one-sided test “adults > children”: p = 0.05), indicating weaker urge-tic associations in children and adolescents compared to adults (Fig. 5 ).