Barely Significant

Excerpts

27,100 sentences · 1 filter applied

marginally significantp = 0.0821.6× alphagold
The addition of consumers (either with ambient or increased nutrients) or the addition of fertilizer (without grazers) led to marginally significant overall changes in structural variables (respectively, t 2 = −3.28, −16.26, 3.97; p = 0.082, 0.004, 0.058; Fig. 3A,B ), while the addition of fertilizer in grazed plots did not lead to change( t 2 = −1.30; p = 0.32; Fig. 3B ).
marginally significantp = 0.0821.6× alphagold
Tobacco smoking was significantly associated with reduced recurrence-free survival (50.2% versus 100% for never smokers; log-rank p = 0.045), while HPV-status association with increased recurrence-free survival was marginally significant (75.5% for HPV-positive versus 48.8% for HPV-negative; log-rank p = 0.082) (Supplementary Fig. 1A,B ).
a trend towards significancep = 0.08221.6× alpha
Mean number of OHMs The mean number of OHMs decreased throughout the follow-up, significantly at 1-day and up to 6-months of follow-up (p = < 0.0001, respectively) then with a trend towards significance at M9 and M12 of the follow up, (p = 0.0822 and 0.0586, respectively) Table 1 .
marginally statistically significantp = 0.0831.7× alphagold
Primary analyses In the logistic mixed effect model, there was a marginally statistically significant impact of condition (-0.255, SE = 0.147, p = 0.083), with those in the No-Bias condition being almost 23% less likely to deploy police as compared to those in the Bias condition (Odds ratio = 0.775, 95% CI: 0.581, 1.034).
nearly significantp = 0.0831.7× alphagold
Moreover, in the blindfolded group, we found a nearly significant correlation between proprioceptive shift and the increase in illusion statement rating in congruent compared to incongruent conditions (ρ = 0.322, p = 0.083; see Supplementary Fig. 1b ); this relationship was not found in the control group (ρ = −0.283, p = 0.129).
As might be expected, patients with the most prolonged ocSSRT in the OFF phase showed a trend for the greatest improvements from OFF to ON, although this just failed to reach significance (correlation coefficient between OFF ocSSRT and change in ocSSRT was 0.378, p = 0.083).By contrast, there was no relationship between the OFF RT and the change in ocSSRT from OFF to ON (correlation coefficient 0.117, p = 0.61).