Excerpts

Pigs fed formaldehyde-treated diets had marginal significance (3.75 ± 0.53, 2.94 ± 0.53; P = 0.074) for lower percentages of S24-7 bacteria species than pigs fed non-formaldehyde treated diets.

We found a significant difference between the H and VH group on map B ( p < 0.05, W = 55, BF 01 = 0.269), and approaching significance between the groups on map C ( p = 0.074, W = 57, BF 01 = 0.350).

Specifically, in males, the diameter of mGGO reached statistical significance ( P = 0.0357), while in females, it was marginally significant ( P = 0.0745) (Table 6 ).

340–380 ms : The ANOVA of Lexicality and Region yielded a marginally significant effect of Lexicality (F(1, 16) = 3.64, p = 0.075, partial η 2 = 0.19) suggesting that real characters vMMN tends to be larger than pseudo- characters’ (−1.52 vs. −0.58 μV).

Age was only near significance (p = 0.075), but was maintained in the multivariate model.

In the multivariable analysis, longer prehospital symptom durations predicted recurrent RCD (P = 0.039), and younger ages were near-significant predictors of recurrent RCD (P = 0.075) (Table 3 ).

This gene is moderately expressed in the bovine mammary gland and also showed a trend (p = 0.075) to correlate to CHL_milk concentration (Table S4c ).

Our multivariate analysis indicates that patients received chemoradiotherapy had borderline significance ( P = 0.075) 23 .

For the experiment, we observed a significant effect of the bacterial inoculation (F 1,142 = 76.8; p < 0.001) and bioassay plant genotype (F 2,142 = 19.8; p < 0.001) on larval performance, but only a marginally insignificant interaction between the two (F 2,142 = 2.64; p = 0.075).

The TMT-A score was also marginally significant: the HIGH fall-risk group took longer to complete the task than the LOW fall-risk ( Z = 1.817, p = 0.075, r = 0.406).

Other risk factors Our analysis identified postmenopausal status as a potential risk factor for severe CIPN, with a trend toward significance in multivariate analysis (adjusted OR = 1.88, p = 0.075).

Importantly, baseline plasma meanVAF < 2.29% showed near-significant potential in predicting PFS (HR 0.08, 95% CI 0.01–1.28, P = 0.075), potentially serving as an independent predictor of PFS (Tables S3 and S4 ).

7b ), and nearly significant difference also between the average versus good normosmics (p = 0.075).

Such analysis showed a trend towards positive correlation between G or C alleles and RNA half-life (β = 0.023, p = 0.075 for untransformed RNA half-life; Figure 5C ).

There was a significant main effect of time ( p = 0.012) and borderline significant group-by-time interaction ( p = 0.075).

Among the variables examined, OVOL1 expression demonstrated marginal significance as an independent prognostic predictor for OS outcomes in pancreatic cancer patients (HR = 1.472, 95% CI: 0.961–2.254, p = 0.075) (Table S1 ).

While AKT2: rs892119 indicated a clear trend to have reduced risk of distant failure when patients carried at least one variant allele (HR = 0.579, 95% CI = 0.317–1.057, P = 0.075).

Nmb displayed a strong trend towards being upregulated in female fat tissue at 2.2-fold (p = 0.075), whereas Lep trended towards a higher expression in male fat tissue at 1.6-fold (p = 0.088).

However, only a statistical trend in correlation was found between overall postoperative mortality and open PD (Omnibus p = 0.075) (Fig. 6 B).

As showed in MVA, another two SNPs-AKT1:rs1130214, and mTOR:rs11121704 showed an obvious trend toward inferior DMFS in patients with one or two variant alleles (AKT1:rs1130214 HR = 1.566, 95% CI = 0.956–2.567, P = 0.075; mTOR:rs11121704 HR = 1.655, 95% CI = 0.933–2.935, P = 0.085).

The value of BV/TV in the Pre-PTH group was 74.77% with close to the level of significance compare with Control group ( p = 0.075) and with no significant difference when compared with Post-PTH group ( p = 0.237).

There was also a trend toward significance for the use of other psychoactive substances (β = 0.879, p = 0.075).

There was a trend toward significance for the effect of beneficiary (F (1,49) = 3.31, p = 0.075, η 2 = 0.063 [0.000, 0.228]) meaning that the participants were slightly more likely to pursue the gamble with higher expected value when they chose for the partner, given the same difference in expected value.

Only the Emotional Symptoms scale showed a trend difference (p = 0.075; η = 0.220; η 2 = 0.048), with higher scores for onco-hematology and pulmonology patients and lower scores for gastroenterology patients (Table 5 ).

However, there was a marginally non-significant interaction between valence and prevalence (Fig. 1 : LRT = − 2.294, p = 0.075) and a significant interaction between valence and task-specificity (Fig. 1 : LRT = 2.753, p = 0.021).