The gene UNG gave a marginally significant estimation (p = 0.07, Welch’s t-test).
Excerpts
5B ), and proliferating Ki-67 positive cells were decreased with marginal significance (P = 0.07; Fig. 5B ) in aCXCL16-treated group compared with the control group.
However, only the observed decrease in the duration of visits was marginally significant (Mann-Whitney U-tests, P = 0.07; rest of comparisons P > 0.33; Fig. 4 ).
The associations of grades of dipstick proteinuria with stages of localized periodontitis were marginally significant in Models 1–3 (β = 0.03, p = 0.07, 0.06 and 0.07, respectively).
a trend towards significancep = 0.07
There was a trend towards significance for sex of the subjects, with males reorienting the seesaw more often than females (OR: 7.36; df = 7, p = 0.07, N = 479).
In terms of relative frequency, there was a significant effect of condition (p<0.05), with the post hoc showing a significant difference between S and N (S < N, p<0.05) and with a trend towards significance between S and L (S < L, p=0.07).
We also observed changes in OTU richness, which almost reached statistical significance (p = 0.07, Fig. 3 ).
amazonensis infective juveniles displayed a marginally significant (P = 0.07, Dunnett’s Test) preference for undamaged corn seedlings versus blank controls.
T CORE -ANT + at exercise termination showed similar correlations with ΔT P from warm-up to recovery (ΔTP WU–REC) at T3 ( r = 0.85, p = 0.002) and a near-significant correlation at T2 ( r = 0.56, p = 0.07), but no association at T1 ( r = 0.04, p = 0.906).
showed a trendp = 0.07
Interhemispheric functional connectivity For interhemispheric connectivity between non-dominant M1 and sensorimotor ROIs in the contralateral, dominant hemisphere, rmANOVA analyses with the between-subject factor ‘group’ (uCP, TD) and the within-subjects factor ‘interhemispheric M1-connectivity’ showed a trend toward a ‘group*connection’ interaction (F (3, 82) = 2.45, p = 0.07, Wilks’ Lambda = 0.92), indicating a different pattern between ROI pairs in each group (Table 1 , Fig. 1c ).
of borderline significancep = 0.07
24 sub-threshold RCC-susceptibility loci either overlapped or lay within 25 kb of a HIF-binding site, which was of borderline significance (p = 0.07) (Fig. 6C ).
showed a trendp = 0.07
In this present study, median values of IL-8 showed a trend of difference between baseline/control site and the nasal bridge after NIV-therapy (p = 0.07).
close to significancep = 0.070
Improvement for voiceless plosive pairs that differed by place of articulation was close to significance ( t (25) = 3.5, p = 0.070; mean effect: 13.5%; SD: 19.6%).
Although condition showed a tendency toward significance ( χ 2 ( 2 ) = 5.12, p = 0.07, d = 0.42), a closer inspection of the results for condition indicated that participants performed worse in the silent-mode smartphone condition ( B = 0.78, 95% CI [0.15, 1.41], t = 2.05, p = 0.03, d = 0.38) than did participants in the turned-off smartphone condition, whereas no differences were found between participants in the calculator condition and those in the turned-off smartphone condition ( p = 0.32) or between participants in the calculator condition and those in the silent-mode smartphone condition ( p = 0.22).
The genotype by environment interaction remained significant for four of the six models ( P < 0.05, plus a statistical trend for Extraversion measured with the BFI: P = 0.07).
2 , the Useless risk group (Cluster 2) showed significantly lower loss aversion in MGT, and higher scores in stimulant risk assessed with S&IRQ, than Risk-avoidant (Cluster 1) and Useful risk (Cluster 3) groups; additionally, the Useless risk group also scored significantly lower than the Useful risk group on the IGT and showed a significant trend ( p = 0.070) towards less consistency in their decisions as assessed by the MGT than the latter group (Table 4 ).
approached significanceP = 0.070
It was found that the latency to first following approached significance, suggesting a difference (Kiyosu; 2.763 ± 0.602, d-rR; 0.963 ± 0.540, P = 0.070 (Fig. 6 B)).
approached significancep = 0.07
There still remained no significant group × time interaction, though the effect size more than doubled (near medium) and approached significance, ( F (1,56) = 3.38, p = 0.07, η p 2 = 0.06, d = 0.48).
4 a: χ 2 = 11.07, p = 0.011) but only marginally significant in presence of flashlight (Fig. 4 b: χ 2 = 7.0545, p = 0.070).
Moreover, the difference between the two groups in delta 1 was marginally significant but in the expected direction, with delta 1 being larger in the Training-first group than in the Waiting-first group ( p < 0.07; Cohen’s d = 0.49).
A previous study by 42 investigated auditory evoked potentials in response to heartbeat-related sounds versus externally generated sounds and found a marginally significant (p = 0.07) suppression of the N1 component when sound onset was locked to the participant’s heartbeat.
showed a trendp < 0.07
Behaviorally, schizophrenia group showed a trend level of higher subjective amusement than healthy controls ( p < 0.07, Table 1 ).
Indeed, the model accounting for nine variables (the gain of similarity of three muscles per three phases) was almost significant (R = 0.65, p = 0.07), with the individual contributions confirming a prominent role of similarity gain for ADM in reaching (β = − 0.41 p = 0.02) and holding (β = − 0.40 p = 0.06) phases, and only marginal, non-significant, contributions of other variables.
close to significancep = 0.07
Midsleep and bedtime at age 2 were close to significance with hyperopia at age 5 (OR = 1.36 (0.98;1.88), p = 0.07 and OR = 1.37 (0.99;1.90), p = 0.06, respectively) but not anymore after adjustment.
NRF was marginally significant ( F 2,81 = 2.73, P = 0.07) across the different grassland types, with the highest NRF (mean: 47.19%) in meadow, followed by steppe (mean: 35.20%) and desert steppe (mean: 17.90%; Appendix S2: Table S6 ).