Excerpts

In addition, storms also had a negative and marginally significant effect in the small islet of Binicodrell Petit (t = -2.541, P = 0.051).

Accordingly, diffusivity differences in the superior cerebellar peduncle (SCP) showed a trend with tool use (ASD group, AD: p = 0.051), supporting the notion that alterations of the SCP may be related to motor deficits rather than clinical group membership, in contrast to the decreased diffusivities of the middle cerebellar peduncle, which may be more related to autism core symptomatology.

The SOFA score also showed a trend toward a significant correlation with CRT (rs = 0.18, P = 0.051) (Fig.

Associations with demographic variables and lifestyle Female sex was associated with hyperthyroidism before (OR 4.55 [1.25–16.5], P = 0.02) and after adjustments (aOR 4.50 [1.21–16.7], P = 0.03), while the association between age and hyperthyroidism was borderline significant before (OR 1.56 [1.00–2.42] per decade, P = 0.051) and after adjustments (aOR 1.51 [0.95–2.37] per decade, P = 0.08).

A positive effect of experiencing the musicians live on movement entrainment did not quite reach significance, t (66) = 1.99, p = 0.051 (Supplementary Table S14).

Furthermore, there was a marginally significant interaction of hemisphere × MA [ F (2, 100) = 3.07, p = 0.051, η p 2 = 0.06].

The two conditions with potential ostensive cues (Nodding and Nodding with direct gaze) resulted in marginally significant gaze following and medium effect sizes ( t (21) = 1.715, p = .051, d = 0.75, t (21) = 1.699, p = .052, d = 0.74, respectively).

The effect of Condition was marginally significant in the R4 repetition lag, F (2, 26) = 3.35, p = 0.051, η p 2 = 0.205, and was not significant in the R2 repetition lag, F (2, 26) = 0.70, p = 0.505, η p 2 = 0.051.

3 ) and brown males where the effect was marginally non-significant (Tukey’s HSD test: p = 0.051; Table S2 , Fig. 3 ).

The latency of the OVX-TPTD group showed an increasing trend at 4 weeks after the initial administration (p = 0.051, t -test), and the antinociceptive effect remained about the same through the final day of administration.

The BEI treatment showed a marginally non-significant difference ( p = 0.051) with FA.

The post hoc comparison showed a trend decrease (p = 0.051) in oxytocin level when participants in condition C3 were WR compared with when they were NWR (Fig. 3 ; see Supplementary Table S2 for all related statistics).

Although only of borderline significance (P = 0.051), RT sequence was also a prognostic factor for DFS.

Infants in the redundant condition showed marginally significant visual recovery when ADS changed to IDS in native speech ( t (19) 2.085, p = 0.051).

Including cardiorespiratory fitness (VO 2peak ) as covariate in the interaction analysis revealed significant activations in the same clusters as in the original model (except for the cluster peaking in the left supramarginal gyrus, which remained only marginally significant (p = 0.051)).

As displayed in the Supplementary Materials (Table S4 ), all findings remained significant ( p < 0.01), except for the direct daily association between NO 2 and fatigue which became marginally significant ( p = 0.051) but continued to be qualified by the significant interaction.

Medication intake Medication intake in the form of contraceptives was lower with a statistical trend ( p = 0.051) in marathoners/ultra-marathoners compared to half-marathoners and 10-km runners.

There was a strong trend towards an increase in variant coefficient when comparing R6/2 (vehicle) mice with WT littermates ( p = 0.051) (Fig. 4f ).

The SIRI indicator showed a statistically marginal significance between the groups ( P = 0.051).

In addition, the correlation between ELS Unintelligibility and the VABS-2 Interpersonal Relationships subdomain just failed to reach significance ( p = 0.051).

Between T0 and T1, reductions in BoP and mPI were significant (both p < 0.001), whereas the decrease in PPD showed a marginal trend ( p = 0.051).

For the responses to incorrect (S4G), there were no significant effects, although the main effect of Group showed a strong trend (F(1,14) = 4.54, p = 0.051), again suggesting that rats with alcohol history touched the screen more often, particularly at the correct location.

The comparison with the other bivalent condition only approached significance, t (115.86) = 2.68; p = 0.051.

However, while approaching significance [F(1, 262) = 3.85, p = 0.051], the main effect of housing was not significant.

Smoking was also approaching significance (B = − 1.203, p = 0.051).