Excerpts

Multivariate analyses In the multivariate analyses (Table 2 ), high expression of miR-141 (TE + TS) was borderline significant for BFFS (HR = 1.07 95% CI 1.00–1.14, p = 0.050), not with CFFS (HR = 2.32 95% CI 0.94–5.73, p = 0.068).

Multivariable modelling and the relations between predictor variables All predictor variables having shown nominally significant (p < 0.05) effects on hand preference in univariable testing (i.e. all but maternal smoking) were then included in the multivariable analysis, using general linear modelling (Methods), with hand preference as the dependent variable.

Knockdown of the two L-type Ca-channel units CACNA1F and CACNA1H revealed lower levels of reductions with effects close to significance (p = 0.05 and 0.09, respectively) (Fig. 3b ).

Compared with the DR group, the average optical density of GSDMD in the SCU treatment group showed a decreasing trend (P < 0.05) (Fig. 2 B).

Differentially methylation CpG sites The epigenome-wide differential methylation analysis revealed 26982 CpG sites that differed between obese and lean individuals with nominally significant p-values (p ≤ 0.05).

They reported promising prospective results suggesting that preictal PAC modulations may be significant for the whole group of patients (p < 0.05).

Nominally significant linear associations (p < 0.05) among continuous predictor and outcome variables were further compared among tertiles of m.3243A > G heteroplasmy using ANOVA and general linear models were used to test differences among tertiles of heteroplasmy.

For the time series where the MK test indicated a significant trend ( p < 0.05), the magnitude of the trend was quantified using the Theil-Sen estimator 30 – 33 .

A nominally significant result was determined at the P < 0.05 threshold.

Following 47 , we considered an adjusted p-value to be highly significant at p < 0.05, and significant at p < 0.1.

In addition, the values determined in super-tasters at 2.5 s were higher than those of non-tasters ( P = 0.0012; Newman-Keuls test) and of medium taster, although at the limit of statistical significance ( P = 0.05; Newman-Keuls test), and those of PAV/PAV subjects were higher than those of AVI/AVI subjects, also in this case at the limit of significance ( P = 0.05; Newman-Keuls test).

However, co-treatment of MGO-challenged COCs with the TAB cocktail showed a trend towards increased Rage mRNA expression (Fig. 6 C, P > 0.05) compared to MGO-challenged COCs alone.

Six variants (rs1260326, rs4410790, rs6968554, rs6968865, rs17685 and rs6265) were nominally significant ( P < 0.05), while three variants on 7p21 (rs4410790, rs6968554 and rs6968865) were significant after multiple correction ( P < 0.05/11).

7B ) the cell proliferation rate showed an increasing trend on PI_v treated substrates: in particular the SC growth was increased on PI_v+IKV (P < 0.05 vs.

Also, the interaction between cathodal versus sham tDCS, verb type, and response effector approached significance (p = 0.050).

In absolute values, there was an increase in creatinine with borderline significance (HCTZ: 0.50 ± 0.37 vs placebo: 0.27 ± 0.40; p = 0.05).

P-values were presented as statistically significant and highly significant at 95% level of confidence as *P < 0.05, **P < 0.05 is for significantly different from the rest.

Although the physical activity, measured in METs, was higher in the high GNRI group, but this difference did not reach statistical significance (P < 0.05) (Table 1 ).

In addition, post-earthquake mean maximum temperature and pre-earthquake mean rain days had a marginally non-significant association (p = 0.05 – 0.10).

However, for Nepal and Bhutan this association did not reach statistical significance (p < 0.05).

Of the 21 variants, 6 were nominally significant (p < 0.05).

Throughout the experiments, infection had a significant (or nearly significant) effect on the clinical scores of CC019 mice ( p ≤ 0.05).

The total amount of blood transfused during the first 48 hours had borderline significance (p = 0.05).

Though the p values did not reach statistical significance ( P < 0.05), the directions of the associations were consistent when comparing with that in whole blood samples.

There was a marginally significant effect of Group, F (1, 51) = 4.04, p = 0.05, η p 2 = 0.07 indicating higher proportion of congruent choices in the Deaf (54.2%) compared to normal-hearing participants (51.5%, Fig. 3A ).