Barely Significant

Excerpts

27,100 sentences · 1 filter applied

at the limit of significancep = 0.0501.0× alphagold
The interaction between the two factors, at the limit of significance [ F (3,42) = 2.82, p = 0.050, η 2 p = 0.168] was given by participants’ sensitivity being higher for the full vision condition [ M = 4.04, SE = 0.16], as compared to the limited vision condition [ M = 3.75, SE = 0.19], only when participants were lifting the object [ t (14) = 2.91, p = 0.011, r = 0.858].
approached significancep = 0.051.0× alpha
There was no significant main effect of test phase ( F [2, 53.59] = 1.87, p = 0.16), no significant main effect of training condition ( F [2, 27.84] = 0.15, p = 0.86), and an interaction effect that approached significance between training condition and test phase ( F [4, 53.57] = 2.49, p = 0.05) for final right hip flexion error scores.
marginal significanceP = 0.051.0× alphagold
In terms of study design, cohort studies showed higher UA levels in severe cases with marginal significance ( P = 0.05, Hedges’ g = 2.49, 95% CI 0.02–4.97, I 2 = 98.11%, 2 studies), while cross-sectional studies did not reach statistical significance ( P = 0.08, Hedges’ g = 4.00, 95% CI − 0.44 to 8.44, I 2 = 99.09%, 4 studies).