Barely Significant

Excerpts

27,100 sentences · 1 filter applied

a marginal trendp = 0.0440.9× alphagold
In this case, the mean grain size presented a marginal trend towards a significant difference among the three species (Kruskal-Wallis H = 6.23, p = 0.044), whereas the observed differences in the sorting of the grains and the Qz content were not statistically significant (Kruskal-Wallis H = 3.84, p = 0.146 and H = 4.97, p = 0.083, respectively).
marginal significanceP = 0.0450.9× alphagold
Median absolute tumor growth rate for cranial tumors was higher (with marginal significance) than for spinal tumors (0.9 cm 3 /year (IQR = 2.4) versus 0.1 cm 3 /year (IQR = 0.2), P = 0.045), while median relative tumor growth rates for cranial and spinal tumors were nearly identical, 49.5 percent/year (IQR = 47.4) versus 50.2 percent/year (IQR = 47.7), P = 0.4 (Table 1 and Fig. 2 ).
marginally significantp = 0.0450.9× alphagold
Moreover, IdentOpen exhibited a marginally significant effect during cooperation (beta = - 347.54 , 95 % CI [ - 687.25 , - 7.83 ] , t ( 163 ) = - 2.01 , p = 0.045 ) probably reflecting the fact that the maximal payoff in this context can be achieved if both players open the correct door at the same time.
a significant trendp = 0.0450.9× alphagold
The proportion of patients achieving full MRC score within one week also showed a significant trend among the groups (EFG group, 80%; PE group, 50%; IVIg group,12.5%, p = 0.045). the proportion of unaided walking patients in EFG group was higher than PE and IVIg group without statistically differences (80% vs. 50% vs. 37.5%, p = 0.39). the GBS-DS and INCAT scores in EFG group were slightly lower than PE and IVIg group.
marginally significantp < 0.0450.9× alphagold
A statistically significant difference was presented by the samples without waterproofing resin ( F (1, 45) = 31,386, p < 0.032; R 2 = 0.411), marginally significant for the samples with the application of a layer of waterproofing resin (single layer) ( F (1, 45) = 22,618, p < 0.045; R 2 = 0.682) and not significant for double layer ( F (1, 47) = 23,853, R 2 = 0.752, p < 0.065).
marginally significantp = 0.0450.9× alphagold
There were no between-group differences with respect to most components of the CGA upon admission, neither in the primary analysis group nor in the subgroups; a marginally significant difference (p = 0.045) was observed for the Timed Up and Go-Test (TuGT) in the hypovolemic group with a mean 33.00 s ± 18.44 s in the hyponatremia group vs. 19.64 s ± 7.81 s in the reference group (Supplemental Table 2 ).
marginally significantp = 0.0460.9× alphagold
Interestingly, we observed that frequencies of CD4 + CD28 null T cells showed a moderate correlation with both maximum CRP values after surgery (r = 0.214; p = 0.020) and a marginally significant correlation with the total leucocyte count after surgery (r = 0.185; p = 0.046) (Table 2 ).