Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

Additionally, due to large variations within the treatment groups, differences in average values in gene expression between irradiated animals and controls were rarely statistically significant (but always showed a trend with similar direction of regulation between qPCR and microarray measurements, S1 Fig ).
Abstinence from smoking was associated with increased growth in EFW, FL and AC (approximately 50g/week, 0.3 and 2 mm/week respectively) between 30 and 34 weeks gestation compared to ongoing smoking.[ 20 ] Fetal size and passive smoke exposure Among non-smoking mothers, exposure to second hand smoke exposure in restaurants (but not home or workplace) was associated with reduced BPD between 20 and 32 weeks but not 32–38 weeks.[ 19 ] When passive maternal exposure to tobacco smoke was defined as <10ng/mL plasma cotinine, there was a negative association which approached significance between plasma cotinine and second trimester BPD.[ 14 ] Meta-analysis The details available from the eight populations included in the meta-analysis are presented in Table 2 .
When using an arbitrary lower cut-off point to define anemia (10 g/dL), for example, we found a marginally significant impact of the intervention on anemia prevalence after one year of intervention (a decline in anemia prevalence between baseline and endline, that was 9 pp greater in intervention compared to control group (95%CI (-0.19, 0.01)).
Antibody responses to different parasite targets and other plasmodium species were useful: in this study, IgG response to Anopheles salivary peptide gSG6-P1 antigen was the only indicator of a significant trend to decrease, a relevant marker of risk for malaria transmission already underlined [ 34 , 35 ].
highly significantqualifiedgold
Polymorphism g.279 G>A showed a highly significant association of the AA genotype with faster disease progression (log-rank test < 0.0001) and this association was also detected when carriers of Mamu-A1*001 (log-rank test < 0.0001) were excluded ( Fig 4 , Table 3 ).