Excerpts

β-caryophyllene showed a similar decrease (36.4%), although the decrease was only marginally significant ( F 1,7 = 3.56, P = 0.10).

No significant memory masking effect was observed for two of the participants (Participant 1 and 3) in Psychophysical Experiment 2, however Participant 2 showed a strong trend ( p <0.1) towards a masking effect in the MSR = 2 condition.

We found a negative trend ( P <0.10) for the effect of distance on peak frequency when all recordings were included, but this relationship disappeared when we removed those calls recorded at distances exceeding 75 m.

Among the 21 survivors, paired analysis showed a trend towards a larger number of responding peptide pools at M12 as compared to baseline (Wilcoxon's signed-rank test, P = 0.10) ( Figure 4 panel C).

For the Avicularia/Laciniata lineage marginally significant ( p -value <0.1) results were obtained for linear axes slightly south of due east and between ∼230° to 270° ( Fig. 1e ).

An ANOVA on this data showed a trend of an effect of day [F(3,79) = 2.01, p = 0.1)] and there may be some contribution of outlying points in determining this trend.

Data were considered significant when p<0.05, and trending toward significance when p<0.1.

Therefore, we also examined the stratified effects and Bonferroni-corrected confidence intervals of interaction terms where there was a trend towards significance (p<0.1) or theoretical potential for effect modification.

Bivariate analysis focused on identifying covariates that showed at least a marginally significant (p-value ≤ 0.10) association with SEQ-12 score.

Ex vivo regional and voxel based morphometry following learning The total brain volume only showed a trend (p = 0.1) towards being enlarged in reachers (450± 11 mm 3 ) relative to controls (441±12 mm 3 ).

This analysis identified a region in RNASE3 (nucleotides 776–950) that exhibited a nearly significant departure from 0 in the Ghanaians population (D = 1.80; p <0.1), indicating that frequency-dependent selection was operating at the c.371G>C SNP.

A marginally significant relationship (p≤0.1) was found between high stress at work and sICAM-1 (9% higher levels), and this relationship was unchanged by the addition of health behaviors ( Table 2 ).

A marginally significant and negative correlation was found between T 4 and urinary MnBP (R = −0.179; p-value < 0.10).

Note that the effect of squirrelfish/bigeyes was nearly significant with a p-value < 0.10.

Exact tests of genic differentiation computed across all pairs of lineages containing more than three individuals were highly significant at each locus (except for the pair Loei/Khon Kaen-Chaiyaphum (p = 0.10) for the bfibr gene and for the pair Uthai Thani-Kanchanaburi (p = 0.12) for the G6pd gene), as well as over all nuclear loci.

While the average amount taken per game is 301.8 Cents in wave 1 (remember that the maximum amount that could be taken is 500 Cents per game), this amount significantly increases to 425.4 in wave 2, and significantly increases further to 496.4 in wave 3 (differences are labeled as significant if p < 0.050 and are labeled as weakly significant if 0.050 ≤ p < 0.100).

Furthermore, multivariate Cox regression analysis of cancer-specific survival showed a trend towards significance in ER-negative patients (P<0.1) and was significant in triple negative patients (P<0.05).

One factor demonstrated a statistical trend (0.05< P <0.10): chronic kidney disease (yes vs. no; P = 0.081).

FFE led to significantly greater signal change than EPI with dewarping at 1.7 mm ( p <0.01), and showed a trend in this direction at 2.0 mm ( p <0.1).

In mothers, there was a small trend for CMS to correlate positively with child age ( r = .20, p < .10), perhaps reflecting increasing knowledge about the child’s internal mental states and thus increased certainty about them.

The correlations with maternal negativity were in the expected direction —risk was uncorrelated with negativity for the 7-absent mothers and higher risk was correlated with stronger negativity for the 7-present mothers—but this was only a marginally significant effect ( p <.10).

Conversely, cartilage is only statistically significant in the MCID-based model, and while borderline significant (p<0.10) in the MPCI-based model, there it presents less than half the added risk seen in the MCID-based model.

Findings that were significant or approached significance (p<0.10) are reported in Table 4 .

P-values in bold with asterisks highlighting differences that were significant (p≤0.05) and marginally significant (p<0.10).

Regarding the association of the contextual variables with the presence of depressive symptoms, on comparing tertiles 3 versus 1, the association of socioeconomic deprivation index was marginally significant at the locality level (OR = 1.28; p<0.10), and significant at the municipality level (OR = 1.16, p<0.01).