Excerpts

This difference approached significance with the conservative, 2-tailed Fisher's Exact test, p = .10.

Light green indicates approaching significance (0.05≤p≤0.1) between the groups shown, indicating a ratio <1.

However, none of the CRE sites show significant enrichment ( Table 1 ), though three of the four are near significance (0.05<p<0.1).

It should be noted however that a positive trend was already noticeable at short term ( p < 0.1).

For April 2019 and July 2019, respectively, a significant (p< 0.01) and an almost significant (p<0.1) relationship between chlorophyll-a concentrations (mg CHLa m -2 ) with the normalised difference vegetation index (NDVI) was found ( Table 7 ).

Conversely, cartilage is only statistically significant in the MCID-based model, and while borderline significant (p<0.10) in the MPCI-based model, there it presents less than half the added risk seen in the MCID-based model.

The interaction among attention , direction of motion , and targets was marginally significant ( F (3, 21) = 2.516, p < .10) for gain of OKN.

For T2, the correlation coefficient for Yourself for perceived support by older relatives was marginally significant ( p < 0.1), while the coefficients for both Yourself and Future generations were both significant for perceived support to younger relatives ( p < 0.001).

In addition, 31% of corals from Butaritari (N = 13) had partial mortality scars associated with the 2004 bleaching event, while none from Abaiang and North Tarawa showed such scars (N = 12); this difference was marginally significant (p = 0.10, permutation test).

A summary of the number of changes in the levels of biochemicals that achieved statistical significance ( p ≤0.05), as well as those approaching significance (0.05< p <0.1) is shown in Table 1 .

The tendency for overlapping identity-concepts within the strongly self-defining Christian network to be interconnected with all other nodes in the network was somewhat greater (B = 1.27, SE = 0.05; 95% CI: 1.18, 1.38) than the weakly self-defining network (B = 1.19, SE = 0.05; 95% CI: 1.09, 1.29), which approached significance ( z = 1.26, p = .10; see “second model” notes in S7 Appendix ).

An a priori significance threshold of α = .05 was used but marginally significant effects ( p < .10) are also reported.

Our IV OLS results in Table 8 suggest a negative, though statistically insignificant, association between retirement and alcohol consumption (β = −0.347; p < 0.01), while retirement has a marginally significant positive effect on participation in physical activity (β = 33.22; p < 0.10).

In addition, in Model 3 the influence of an “integration” ethnic orientation went from non-significant to marginally significant (p < .10) and the influence of an “attenuation” ethnic orientation went from significant at p < .05 to non-significant.

While 5 clones showed significant fitness increases, 3 clones showed increases that were only marginally significant (p<0.1), and 4 clones did not show any change.

P values indicated on figures are for the significant (P<0.05) or near-significant (0.05<P<0.1) factor that has been plotted.

For the ERAS subgroup, the estimated breakpoint was also around 4 days and the LOS variable remained weakly significant (coef. = −0.026, 95% CI [−0.040; −0.012], p < 0.1) ( S8 Table ).

For the tone condition, the difference fell short of significance: χ 2 = 6.32, d.f. = 3, p = .10, but for the syllable condition, the difference was highly significant, χ 2 = 14.7, d.f. = 3, p = .002.

While the Region × Threat Certainty interaction was only marginally significant ( p = 0.10), focal comparisons indicated that that the Ce showed an indiscriminate pattern of reactivity, with statistically indistinguishable levels of heightened activation during the anticipation of certain and uncertain threat.

Although it did not reach p<0.05 FDR corrected significance, there was a trend toward significance in the left lingual gyrus for the TIN>HL contrast as well (the region reached significance at p<0.1 FDR corrected).

While marginally statistically significant associations (p<0.10) were observed between higher 14-day moving average of 24-hr mean temperature and longer QTc utilizing both approaches for estimating mean temperature, no associations were observed for 24-hr mean temperature at shorter moving average windows between 1 and 7 days.

Greenfinches ( Carduelis chloris ) and tree sparrows also showed higher population densities in 2010 but differences were only marginally significant ( P <0.10; Fig. 4 ).

In the univariate analysis, there was a clear trend towards an increased risk of infection in the 6 months following rituximab (odds ratio: 1.51, 95% CI [0.90–2.56], p = 0.1).

As indicated by the higher likelihood scores of model M2a ( Table S3 ), these tests provide significant evidence of adaptive evolution within ESAGs 4, 5, 6, and 7, and are nearly significant (p<0.1) for ESAG1 and ESAG3b .

7 experimental days or 7 meal components), marginal significance ( P <0.1) is also indicated so the reader will be able to reach own conclusions about these results.