Excerpts

Our results showed a trend for suitable environment having an impact on response to the object and noise aggregate indicator (P = 0.1).

While none of the SNPs reached statistical significance for allele-specific imbalance at α = 0.05, three SNPs ( rs16892766, rs6983267, rs7136702 ) showed a trend for allele-specific imbalance (p-values<0.10) prior to Bonferroni correction for multiple comparison (n = 16).

We calculated the summary effect estimate using both fixed and random effect models, since the p-value for the test of homogeneity was marginally significant ( Table 3 ; p<0.10), which suggests some heterogeneity may be present and the variance between studies should be incorporated into the analyses to obtain confidence limits.

Significant and near-significant (p<0.10) differences were then assessed further for independence in sequentially adjusted linear regression models: adjusting first for demographic factors (age, sex, ethnicity); next for retinopathy, neuropathy and BMI; next for blood pressure and antihypertensive medication; and finally for HbA1c.

The RT for both the phoneme discrimination and for the phoneme spelling approached significance ( b = .586, t (30) = 1.720, p = .100 and b = −.446, t (30) = −1.987, p = .060, respectively).

The Biocultural Identity Index (K) also shows a positive, though marginally significant, impact ( β = 0.015, p < 0.1), suggesting that cultural density supports health outcomes.

Regarding the influence of BMI as a covariate, the influence on perceived physical appearance was marginally significant ( β = -.071, p < .10), and that on perceived familiarity was insignificant ( β = .000).

All variables that displayed a moderately significant statistical relationship with osteoporosis in the univariate analysis (P < 0.1) were included by forward selection in the multivariate analysis ( Table 3 ).

In addition, the number of epileptogenic zone (p = 0.057), although not significant at the conventional 0.05 level, demonstrated borderline significance (p < 0.1) and was therefore included for further evaluation.

Indices formulated using green and red bands, GR, NDVIg and OSAVIg showed significant correlation ( P < 0.01) with CCI at anthesis and final grain filling, whereas the correlation between the indices GR and NDVIg with CCI at the initial grain filling stage was only marginally significant (r = 0.56, P < 0.10).

While no significant differences were observed by microarray between healthy and arresting trophoblast, miR-148b verged on significance (p<0.10), and was assessed by Real-Time PCR but the results did not significantly differ.

We additionally report areas found to be marginally significant (p<0.10), as these areas may be informative to underlying white matter microstructural changes in PD in a larger sample.

Healthy trophoblast expressed 1 miRNA, miR-148b , which approached significance (p<0.10), at a higher level than arresting trophoblast.

All covariates that were statistically significant or approached significance at p<0 . 10 in the bivariate analysis were included in the multivariable analysis.

Those variables that were significant or nearly significant (i.e., p <.10, two-tailed test) in the initial ANOVAs presented above were used in subsequent analyses.

In contrast, the mRNA level of Selh was increased by 22.8% (p = 0.062) and 16.2% (p < 0.05) in the cerebellum and the pons, respectively, and that of Selt displayed an increasing trend by 17% (p = 0.1) and 21.8% (p = 0.065) in cortex and pons, respectively.

While the Region × Threat Certainty interaction was only marginally significant ( p = 0.10), focal comparisons indicated that that the Ce showed an indiscriminate pattern of reactivity, with statistically indistinguishable levels of heightened activation during the anticipation of certain and uncertain threat.

Neither testis weight at slaughter (18 months) nor INSL3 concentration appear to correlate with average sperm density ( Fig 4A–4C ), although the former does exhibit a trend towards significance (p<0.10; Fig 4A ).

None of the other tested characteristics, including study arm (clinic or home), were close to significance in predicting preference class membership (p>0.1).

Our borderline significant results (0.05<p-value<0.10) in all likelihood are due to low statistical power.

Marginal Significance: The impact of the Indigenous Population Index (K) is only significant at the 10% level (p < 0.1).

Factors that demonstrated a moderately significant statistical relationship in the univariate analysis ( P <.1) were entered by forward selection in a multivariate Cox proportional-hazards regression model [22] .

To distinguish between good and poor performance, we used a threshold at the marginal significance level of p < 0.1.

Results Which lighting condition maximizes the number and size of clones that a mother generated? By the fourth week of the experiment, the mother phenotype differentially responded to lighting conditions (MANOVA: F 39,192 = 3.68, P<0.001) and genotype (MANOVA: F 13,62 = 31.25, P<0.001) and their interaction was marginally significant (MANOVA: F 39,192 = 1.34, P = 0.10).

The difference between group B and group D is significant on day 1 (p <0.05) and nearly significant on day 7 and day 14 (p < 0.1).