However, the difference in the relative amount of maximum correlation between the responses to the different playbacks after subtraction of randomly occurring correlations for each of the playback conditions accounts at the most for a statistical trend ( χ 2 (6) = 11.571, p = 0.072).
Excerpts
Note A172 cells with STK17A knockdown had a borderline significant decrease in proliferation; p = 0.072.
just failed to reach significancep = 0.072
Differences in total sleep time just failed to reach significance (t 43 = 1.846, p = 0.072).
The overlap of 23 genes also showed a significant trend using the hypergeometric distribution (P = 0.0721) [24] .
tendency towards significancep = 0.0723
The difference between total perfusion (unnormalised rCBF) in regions of the DMN and the rest of the cortex showed a tendency towards significance (two-sample t-test, p = 0.0723).
approached significanceP = 0.0724
Measures of microbial richness and diversity in the luminal and mucosal regions of the fish GIT approached significance but did not vary between APD and PPD diets (Wilcoxon rank test, P = 0.0724).
a near significant trendp = 0.0728
There was a near significant trend suggesting a difference between “Moderate” and “Exposed” sites (Dunn’s test: p = 0.0728).
marginally non-significantp = 0.0729
In the entire cohort, the combined use of sICAM-1 and sVCAM-1 improved discrimination by ~3.5% (p = 0.0002) but in the NGT individuals this improvement was ~1.5% which was marginally non-significant (p = 0.0729).
For normal weight participants, VATob was associated with increased use of 3 and 4 prescriptions (p<0.05, Fig 3 ) and showed a near-significant association with the use of ≥5 medications (p = 0.073).
a trend towards significancep = .073
Additionally, there was also a trend towards significance for a higher sense of understanding in the museum than compared to the laboratory context, F (1,42) = 3.37, p = .073.
Statistical analysis revealed a marginally significant effect of Condition ( F (1,19) = 3.61, p = .073), a main effect of Region ( F (4,76) = 80.73, p <.001), and an interaction between these factors ( F (4,76) = 5.93, p = .002).
The four factor ANOVA revealed a marginally significant interaction effect of Culture×Face×Threat (F(1,19) = 3.616, p = 0.073), as the interaction of Face×Threat was more salient in Chinese subjects (F(1,19) = 58.469, p<0.001) than in American subjects (F(1,19) = 1.911, p = 0.182).
Impact of the admixed status of individuals on survival time A significant interaction between sex and Structure classes ( p = 0.039) and between sex and ROA ( p = 7.7×10 −3 ), and a marginally significant interaction between sex and NewHybrids classes ( p = 0.073) was found.
After activation of the TCA cycle (P P+β ), no statistically significant differences between groups were observed, though there was a near-significant trend towards a decrease in P P+β following sustained hypoxia ( p = 0.073).
showed a trendp = 0.073
ANOVA performed on the mean amplitudes of difference waves showed a trend-level significance of the ‘group’ factor: F (1,36) = 3.412; p = 0.073 (LSE: 0.335 ± 0.174 μV; HSE: 0.779 ± 0.165 μV).
The predicted social presence effect was also marginally significant, F (1, 55) = 3.34, p = .073, η 2 partial = 0.06, suggesting that participants in co-action ( M = 46.56%, SD = 10.49%) were more context sensitive than those who performed the task alone ( M = 39.86%, SD = 14.38%).
borderline non-significantp = 0.073
The same trend was observed for the M2c group, though differences were borderline non-significant (p = 0.073).
showed a trendp = 0.073
EGFR mutations showed a trend to a higher frequency in females compared to males, (p = 0.073).
marginally non-significantp = 0.073
In the 50 m zone, a marginally non-significant effect was only found in Iceland (estimate = 7.57, 95% CI = -0.49–15.65, p = 0.073).
The difference between the highly systematic condition and the unsystematic condition was clearly significant ( p < .001) even after controlling for reading time, whereas the difference between the highly systematic and the somewhat systematic condition was marginally significant ( p = .073).
The difference between the low and control conditions was marginally significant ( p = .073), with estimates in the low condition higher than those in the control condition.
A main effect of Time was obtained [ F (5,115) = 3.47, p = .043, η p 2 = .13], which produced a marginally significant interaction with the consistency of the smile [ F (5,115) = 2.67, p = .073, η p 2 = .10] which is driven by increased activity predominantly from 2500ms onwards for consistent smiles, with a particular peak at 3000ms ( p = .070).
borderline significancep = 0.073
The global RNFL thickness decreased by 4.97 μm per decade (β = -0.497; p = 0.021), and thinning was significant in the superonasal (-9.90 μm per decade, p < 0.001) and temporolower (-6.78 μm per decade, p < 0.001) segments; the same trend showed borderline significance in the superotemporal (-6.96 μm per decade, p = 0.073) and inferotemporal (-7.23 μm per decade, p = 0.059) segments.
As the change in the total score in the matcha group compared with that in the placebo group showed a decreasing trend ( P = 0.073), theanine was suggested to improve sleep quality.
a trend toward significancep = 0.073
There was a trend toward significance in the reduction of body asymmetry by AM1241 (p = 0.073, t-test, Fig 7C ).