“a near-significant trend”

Therefore, the interaction effect of genotype and feeding regimen reached statistical significance for latency time (F(1, 25) = 45.90, p < 0.0001 and F(1, 25) = 10.47, p = 0.0034, respectively), whereas a near-significant trend was evident for the number of buried marbles (F(1, 22) = 33.06, p < 0.0001 and F(1, 22) = 3.943, p = 0.05970, respectively).

However, we found a significant trend of increased mean chr8q in AFR samples in NSCLC (fold change, 1.74; Welch's t -test P = 5E-04; Fig 4 A) and a near-significant trend in LUAD alone (fold change, 1.46; Welch's t -test P = .067; Fig 4 A).

Behavioral context affects body color and patterns Distance from the bottom had a significant effect on body color brightness and swimming speed had a near-significant trend (LMER, P < 0.001 and P = 0.063 respectively; Table 1 ).

In the unweighted analysis, PERMANOVA detected significant separation between smell group, whereas ANOSIM showed a near-significant trend (weighted UniFrac: ANOSIM R 2 = 0.215, p = 0.004; PERMANOVA R 2 = 0.170, p = 0.055; unweighted UniFrac: ANOSIM R 2 = 0.186, p = 0.054; PERMANOVA R 2 = 0.092, p = 0.037.

There was a near-significant trend for think–pair–share ( p = 0.005).

For team-level psychological safety, the intervention group showed a significant main effect (F(2, 291.01) = 3.23, p = 0.041), and the control group showed a near-significant trend (F(2, 340.36) = 2.56, p = 0.008).

Data revealed a near-significant trend for enhancement of somatosensory sensitivity by visual stimulation (t(9) = 2.885, p = 0.018).

In contrast, PC3 showed a near-significant trend for a negative correlation with RYGB Chow (r = −0.49, p = 0.028) and a trend toward a positive correlation with RYGB HFD (r = 0.42, p = 0.065).

In contrast, the two species with cocooned pupae groomed live fungus-exposed brood significantly more than sham-treated brood, and showed a near-significant trend for higher grooming frequency of brood treated with live vs dead fungus (Figure 1 C,D; La. neglectus: F 2,40 = 3.683, P = 0.034; P. punctata: F 2,42 = 6.309, P = 0.004; post hoc Tukey comparisons: live fungus vs sham treatment: P = 0.019 and P = 0.001, live vs dead fungus P = 0.134 and P = 0.076, dead fungus vs sham treatment P = 0.228 and P = 0.075 for La. neglectus and P. punctata respectively).

Despite a significant overall trend in SS-10 scores reduction as per repeated measures ANOVA, pairwise comparisons lacked statistical significance after Bonferroni adjustment, with a near-significant trend noted between 4 and 8 weeks (p=0.0344).

Use of add-on immunosuppressants (steroids or azathioprine) did not show a significant impact on EDSS outcomes, although a near-significant trend was observed for concomitant steroid use after 24 months ( p = 0.05) (Table 2 ).

There were no significant differences in gestational age (GA) at delivery ( p = 0.220); however, neonates from opioid-exposed moms showed a near-significant trend for lower birthweights compared to those of controls ( p = 0.050).

A near-significant trend towards increasing Mediterranean diet adherence across time was observed in ACS patients (MEDAS mean score at inclusion: 8.8 ± 1.6; at 12-months: 9.8 ± 1.6; p = 0.05.

In terms of grade 3 or higher TRAEs, there was no significant difference, but there was a near-significant trend (OR=1.24; 95% CI: 1.00–1.55, P =0.05) (Fig. 5 B).

However, the postoperative PORP and TORP comparison of ABG outcomes was not statistically significant (p = 0.514), and a near-significant trend was observed among ΔABG comparison (p = 0.05; Figure 5).

Variables that demonstrated a near-significant trend on UVA (p < 0.05) were included in the initial multivariable logistic regression model (MVA).

There was a near-significant trend for App group patients to perceive “slightly or much better health” over the last year, while most no-App patients considered their health unchanged ( P = .05) ( Figure 6B ).

There was a near-significant trend for male dogs to look at the food location more frequently than female dogs (GLMM: F 1,21 = 4.300, p = 0.051).

AHA showed a near-significant trend (median = 6, p = 0.051).

Patients aged 80–89 years exhibited a significant trend for hospital mortality (ORs from 0.53 to 2.64, P for interaction = 0.033) and a near-significant trend for ICU mortality (ORs from 0.45 to 2.94, p = 0.051).

In 37 patients (33.6%) the proximal third of SFA was involved (25.0% DM vs 42.6% nDM) with a near-significant trend (p = 0.051).

Analysis of Near-Significant Tendencies A near-significant trend was observed when comparing surface blood to surface saliva ( p = 0.051 ).

In the non-trained test positions that were tested at the 45° and the 135° reference orientation (compare square symbols), there was a near-significant trend for orientation specificity ( t (9) = -3.446, p = .051).

While most patient-derived fibroblast lines showed comparable mtDNA levels to controls, Pt5 exhibited a significantly reduced mtDNA copy number, and Pt2 displayed a near-significant trend ( p = 0.051) toward lower mtDNA content ( Supplementary Figure S7 ).

However, a statistically significant difference was observed only for the submandibular fossa ( p = 0.018), with a near-significant trend noted for the external oblique ridge ( p = 0.051).