Excerpts

Social status shows a trend towards significance (χ 2 = 8.4, df = 4, P-value = 0.07).

Because a borderline significant interaction term was observed between %ucOC and sex (p = 0.07), these analyses were stratified by sex.

DHEA levels showed a trend towards being significantly higher in boys with more environment-related childhood adversity ( p = 0.07).

EMG activity There was a strong trend towards an increased EMG activity during the fatiguing contractions (time main effect; F 1,9 = 9.07; η 2 = 0.4, P = 0.07) but there was no difference between the tasks (task×muscle; F 2,18 = 2.5; η 2 = 0.4, P = 0.87).

Autoimmunity did not differ but interaction of autoimmunity with FMR1 genotype almost reached significance (P = 0.07).

IL-1ra also retained borderline significance (p = 0.07); 1 log 10 unit increase in IL1-ra was associated with 22.3% reduction in bactericidal activity.

In addition, pain sensitivity for pinprick stimuli (MPS) was significantly reduced in the hand of NMO patients (p<0.05), accompanied by a strong trend towards MPS reduction in the feet (p = 0.07; Table 4 ).

As above, we also entered data into a 2×2 repeated measures ANOVA, which confirmed no overall effect of drug administration (F 1,9 = 0.03, p = 0.87), although the order effect again approached significance (F 1,9 = 3.83, p = 0.07), with an average −8.1+/−17.9% change in percentage gambling from week 1 to week 2.

Both male and female Bdnf +/− showed a trend toward increased path length (p = 0.07, for both genders).

2C ), there was only a trend towards significance between stressed and control mice in the average level of post-tetanic potentiation (control 144.3±4.6% vs stress 157.0±4.6%; p = 0.07).

There were significant effects for age (RR for each decade older = 1.91; 95% 1.36, 2.81; P <0.001) and a trend toward significance for tuberculin skin test positivity (RR = 6.52; 95% CI 1.30, 118.5; P = 0·07).

On the other hand the rate of sway within local-control stage increased with neuropathy severity and disease history, approaching significance in our sample (e.g., for local-control slope (ML) P = 0.07; r = 0.57).

The association between type of HDP and prolonged maternal hospital stay was of borderline significance (p = 0.07).

Measurements for the right second half ring (A2-r) approached significance (t = −1.96; P = 0.07).

Patients with PiCCO-monitoring showed a trend to higher SOFA-values compared to the patients without PiCCO (11.45 vs. 9.76; p=0.070).

Typicality showed a trend towards an increase versus Experiment 1 [F(1,218) = 3.48, p < 0.07], and was significantly increased relative to Experiment 2a [F(1,39) = 17.22, p < 0.0002, partial ω 2 = 0.29].

CRLB of metabolites that were significantly different or showed a trend between the two groups are marked with *p<0.07, **p<0.001.

The post-hoc test displayed a significantly lower HOMA-IR index at ZT4 ( F = 5.046, P = 0.030) and a borderline significant decrease at ZT8 ( F = 3.468, P = 0.070) in the shift work group as compared with those of the control group.

In the comparison of mechanical debridement plus antibiotics versus mechanical debridement alone, adjunctive antibiotics were associated with significant improvements in CAL (pooled effect size: −0.84; 95% CI: [−1.55, −0.13]; P = 0.02), PPD (−0.73; [−1.19, −0.27]; P = 0.002) and PS (−3.94; [−7.14, −0.74]; P = 0.02), while the reduction in BOP approached significance (−18.64; [−38.91, 1.63]; P = 0.07).

3A ), we found a significant main effect of factors verb [F(1,17) = 39.72, p<0.001] and SOA [F(1,17) = 984.64, p<0.001], while the factor arm was very close to being significant [F(1,17) = 3.53, p = 0.07].

A repeated measures ANOVA of all observers’ data revealed a marginally significant effect of condition on MOT performance, F (2, 10) = 3.48, p = .07.

For the HGSNAT p.R384X allele, a clear increase was also observed, with borderline significance (p = 0.07) ( Fig 4D ).

Also the three-way interaction among Emotional content, Anterior-Posterior, and Hemisphere approached significance (F (2,58) = 3.19, p = 0.07).

The only exception was Question 4 to which the primary cohort’s response to Question 4 which was approaching significance, Primary - Question 4: χ 2 (84)=3.18, p = 0.07 and the secondary cohort’s response was not significant, p = 0.18.

In 3 more cases differences were also marginally significant ( P <0.07, Fig 1 ).