Excerpts

More importantly, the overall results also revealed a marginally significant distance × congruence interaction [F (1, 27) = 3.53, p = .07, η 2 partial = .12] and a significant distance × congruence × hemisphere interaction [F (2, 54) = 5.03, p < .05, η 2 partial = .16].

The task × force level interaction was marginally significant, F (1,24) = 3.50, p = .07, η p 2 = .127.

However, the interaction between perceptions of extreme weather and political ideology was not significant for worry, B Ideology*EWPerceptions = -.01, SE = .01, p = .16, and was marginally significant for beliefs about the cause of climate change, B Ideology*EWPerceptions = -.02, SE = .01, p = .07.

Psychological test scores and rGMV in the Pt We found a marginally significant correlation between the change ratio of one attention domain subtest (D-CAT1) and post−pre thalamic rGMV (x = 8, y = −12, z = 7; P = 0.07, SVC).

A lack of power might be accountable for the absence of a significant effect for visual TOM in our study, given that the pooled ES approached significance (P = 0.07).

In the EU group EGR3 SNP rs1877670 showed a trend toward association (p = 0.07), and the ARC SNP rs35900184 revealed a significant association with the schizophrenia diagnosis (p = 0.02).

In the AA cohort, there were no significant associations between the three EGR3 or the single ARC SNP tested, though the ARC SNP rs1996147 showed a trend toward significance (p = 0.07).

The keel score decrease for northern Gouldian finches was especially marked, although the interaction between Species, Zone and Season was not quite significant (p = 0.07; Table 1 ; Fig 5 ).

Because a borderline significant interaction term was observed between %ucOC and sex (p = 0.07), these analyses were stratified by sex.

In the case of cmetS-Z, however, a marginally significant relationship with fitness was only found in girls ( p = 0.07).

In contrast, a similar ANOVA for the alpha session did not show the main interaction ( F 2,29 = 2.27, p = 0.12, η 2 = 0.14), although a quadratic trend approached significance ( F 1,30 = 3.46, p = 0.07, η 2 = 0.10).

However, these increases were only marginally significant (p = 0.070).

The Recording message produced a DNA rate of 9.6% (230/2395), which is not significantly higher than the Specific Costs message, although it was close to significance at the 0.05 level (OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.97–1.44, P = 0.07).

The atazanavir C 12 was higher (median, 0.85 mg/L; range, 0.11–1.75) in patients with incident stones compared with patients without stones (median, 0.66 mg/L; range, 0.01–5.84), but the difference was of borderline significance ( P = 0.07).

Post-hoc comparisons achieved an almost significant effect (p = 0.07) of the drug in the time spent by animals in exploring the light compartment, when compared to vehicle administered animals.

While the levels of arginine were unchanged, MMA and ADMA were significantly reduced (p< 0.01 and p< 0.05, respectively) and SDMA reduction almost reached statistical significance (p = 0.07) with HFHC diet ( Fig 3E ).

However, despite the loss of the ica operon by the ST71-like isolates there was no significant difference between typical CC97 isolates and ST71-like isolates in their ability to form a biofilm in TSB (P = 0.88) or TSB + 4% NaCl (P = 1) while the difference in TSB + 1% glucose approached significance (P = 0.07).

For the HGSNAT p.R384X allele, a clear increase was also observed, with borderline significance (p = 0.07) ( Fig 4D ).

On the other hand the rate of sway within local-control stage increased with neuropathy severity and disease history, approaching significance in our sample (e.g., for local-control slope (ML) P = 0.07; r = 0.57).

Additionally, the only regions in which group differences in signal intensity for viewing Other faces approached significance were BA 44 (t(22) = 1.717, p = 0.07) and BA 45 (t(22) = 1.717, p = 0.08), confirming the results of our between-group comparison based on the functionally defined ROI in this area.

There was borderline significance between nib-to-fingertip distance and the presence of myopia (P = 0.07).

A Cox-model for DDFS with the three main effects for ER, PAR-1 and PAR-2, the three two-way interaction terms ER*PAR-1, ER*PAR-2 and PAR-1*PAR-2, and finally a term ER*PAR-1*PAR-2 for the three-way interaction, suggested a three-way interaction, which was almost significant (P = 0.070).

However, we did observe a significantly greater length of time to the approach for the COG condition and a strong trend for significance during the TXT condition (P = 0.07) due to a significant reduction in step length and double support phase for the TXT (P = 0.011) and COG conditions (P = 0.004).

The Block x Group interaction was marginally significant (F (26,884) = 1.45; p = 0.07), indicating a trend for a difference among the three groups in the rate of performance improvement.

Although we also found a trend towards significance for the interaction between diurnal cortisol slope and IL-6 (p = .07) as well as AUCg and CRP (p = .06), power is limited.