As suggested by the simple correlation reported above, the mixed effects model also demonstrated that pup numbers increased with date (LME estimate: 0.86, t = 34.01, p < 0.0001) and in addition there was a weak trend towards higher numbers being counted at high tide (LME estimate: 2.50, t = 1.52, p = 0.065), most likely because pups are more difficult to detect along wide rocky tidal shores.
Excerpts
a trend toward significancep = 0.065
We observed that for the FF samples, C t was significantly reduced with increased time of exposure to room temperature for GAPDH (p = 0.036; Table 5 ) with a trend toward significance for ACTB (p = 0.065).
In fact, a one-way RM ANOVA with Greenhouse-Geisser correction revealed a significant difference for AI within prism distortions (F (1.86, 20.45) = 5.091, p = 0.018; η 2 p = 0.316; 1-β = 0.74, n = 14 to achieve 1-β = 0.8; post hoc NK test: 0° vs 15°, p = 0.004, and 5° vs 15°, p = 0.024) and only a marginal significance for MT within prism distorsions (F (2.19, 24.06) = 2.987, p = 0.065; η 2 p = 0.214; 1-β = 0.55, n = 19 to achieve 1-β = 0.8, post hoc NK test: 0° vs 15°, p = 0.05).
Subsequent post hoc comparison of the amygdala versus hypothalamus for the antibody MA1-620 suggests a statistical trend towards a greater intensity of labeling in the amygdala (p = .065).
A block-group interaction [ F(6,120) = 3.23, p = .006] and a block-cue-group interaction [ F(6,120) = 2.58, p = .022] also emerged, with a main effect of group approaching significance [ F(2,40) = 2.59, p = .065].
There was a marginally statistically significant effect of both trait rumination F (1, 58) = 3.54, p = .065, η p 2 = . 06 and state rumination F (1, 58) = 3.22, p = .078. η p 2 = . 05 on TRI scores, but no effect of either trait rumination F (1, 58) = 4, p = .409, η p 2 = . 01 or state rumination F (1, 58) =, p = .102, η p 2 = . 05 on TUT scores.
Thirdly, the body of evidence on job stress and dissatisfaction could not demonstrate a clear association with mental health problems but only a suggestive trend, with nine of the 11 comparisons showing harm (82%, 95%CI [48%;98%], p = 0.065) ( Table 2 ) [ 26 , 31 , 35 , 38 , 41 , 42 , 46 , 48 , 49 ].
There was an overall trend toward a sex effect (F 1,77 = 3.51, p = 0.065) much of which was due to differences between male and female +/- mice ( Fig 1D .).
approached significancep = 0.065
The decrease in IFN-γ production between these two groups approached significance (p = 0.065).
The interaction of stocking method x month was marginally significant (P = 0.065) for CP in 2014.
An interaction between trial type and habituation stimuli was marginally significant ( F (1, 21) = 3.807, p = .065, partial η 2 = .153), indicating a tendency for a directionality effect [ 33 ].
The logistic regression analysis adjusted by gender and age showed a nominally significant association for rs2241766 GG+GT genotype ( P = 0.065, OR = 1.55) and rs1501299 GG genotype in recessive model (OR = 1.54, P = 0.066).
Analyses revealed an overall main effect of time (F [5] , [49] = 5.60, p = 0.0004) and a significant interaction (F [5] , [49] = 5.39, p = 0.0005) for the number of pERK cells, and a main effect of time (F [5] , [50] = 11.12, p <0.0001) and a marginally significant interaction (F [5] , [50] = 2.23, p = 0.0654) for pNR1.
approached significancep = 0.0655
While frequency of variance did not differ appreciably between the two groups at CNPs 1162 and 1956, the difference of variance at CNP 1303 approached significance (p = 0.0655).
This overall interaction effect was marginally insignificant in 2011 (p = 0.0659), but more pronounced in 2012 (p = 0.0266) ( Table 1 ).
approached significancep = 0.066
Analysis of Choice A Group X Dose X Choice ANOVA revealed an overall interaction that approached significance (F(9, 198) = 1.823, p = 0.066; Fig 1 ).
For the EO condition, a strong trend could be demonstrated ( r = 0.724, p = 0.066).
Pheophytin, an indicator of dead phytoplankton, was also highest in freshwater and lowest in emergent salt marsh, but this effect was marginally significant ( F 5 , 30 = 2.34, P = 0.066; Means ± SD: freshwater = 15.84 ± 9.79 μg/L, tidal-forested = 10.39 ± 3.40 μg/L, transitional = 8.91 ± 4.42 μg/L, emergent salt marsh = 5.00 ± 4.28 μg/L, mudflat = 11.44 ± 10.44 μg/L, eelgrass = 5.03 ± 2.85 μg/L).
approached significancep = .066
Neither change in intake in recommended diet foods nor change in spectrophotometry score made a unique contribution, though the latter approached significance (beta = .372, p = .066).
Participants showed a marginally significant increase in overall discrimination accuracy (day 1: 83.8 ± 8.0%, mean ± standard deviation; day 2: 86.8 ± 5.8%; paired t test, t (19) = 1.95, P = 0.066; Cohen’s d av = 0.43) [ 41 ] and a significant decrease in overall discrimination RTs (day 1: 696 ± 70 ms; day 2: 665 ± 72 ms; paired t test, t (19) = 3.17, P = 0.005; Cohen’s d av = 0.43).
[19] , whose genotypic distribution in controls deviated from HWE, the borderline significant association was lost ( P = 0.066; allelic model).
Additionally, in the latter treatment, there was more than a two-fold decrease in vitellogenin expression (t 4 = 6.763, p<0.0025), whereas this effect in promethazine was positive, although not quite significant (t 4 = 2.511, p>0.066).
borderline significanceP=0.066
The level of circulating Lin28B had a significant association with high BCLC stage (stage B to C diseases versus A1 to A4 diseases) (P=0.022) ( Figure S6A ) and had a borderline significance in associated with high AJCC stage (stage IIIC to IVA diseases versus I to IIIB diseases) (P=0.066) ( Figure S6B ).
Respiration rates after 6 months in the treatments were not significantly influenced by acidification, but tended to be lower in acidified conditions (reflected in a marginally significant interaction between pH and acclimation: F 1 = 4.513, p = 0.066; S2 Table ; Fig 2D ).
The analysis of the cumulative number of GEL between the first and the second period of treatment showed a significant trend to lower mean number of GEL in the second period suggesting a potential carryover effect of MSCs administration (13.33±20.5 vs 9.78±20.02, p = 0.066).