Excerpts

In this case, however, values under absorptive state (24.67 ± 1.50) only showed marginal significance (Bonferroni post-hoc , p = 0.062) when compared to the control sample (26.73 ± 1.76).

The interaction between Presentation Condition and Experiment approached significance, F (1,7) = 4.9, p = .062, η 2 p = .41, as the motion-experienced pigeons seemed to be able to use the motion cues more effectively during this earlier portion of training than the motion-naïve birds.

The pooled estimate in men was greater than that in women (p = 0.003), rho = 0.37 (95% CI: 0.30 to 0.44) with borderline significant heterogeneity by country ( I 2 = 47.9%, p = 0.062).

Another SNP, rs2043534 in NPAS2 , had marginal significance (p-value = 0.062).

The difference in number of granule neurons between exercised and sedentary control animals fell just short of statistical significance (p = 0.062).

The relative importance of predation risk was greater in Copper than No Copper treatments (0.87 ± 0.19 and 0.50 ± 0.06, respectively; mean ± SEM)–though this comparison was marginally significant at α = 0.05 (two sample t-test, t 4.80 = -1.86, p = 0.062).

The correlation between platelets CoQ 10-TOTAL and noncoupled Complex I-linked oxygen consumption after addition of substrate glutamate (4G) was marginally significant in both control group (p = 0.062) and RA_ALL patients (p = 0.060), ( Fig 4D ).

Of note, the grooming network’s reciprocity showed a trend (p = 0.062) to be significantly higher than expected by chance compared to random networks of the same size and density.

A statistically significant difference was found between admitted doping users and non-users in explicit attitude (p<.001) and social projection of doping use (p = .024), with a borderline significance for pressure to use doping (p = .062).

STK11 and PTEN mutations in non-smokers were lower than in smokers, but the difference was of marginal significance [2.1% (1/48) and 6.3% (7/112) vs. 13.2% (7/53) and 13.0% (14/108), X 2 = 4.274 and 2.87, P = 0.062 and 0.09, respectively].

The interaction just failed significance (F[2,18] = 3.257, p = .062).

In subgroup analyses, Beijing strains only had a significant association with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (aOR 6.1; 1.2–30.4), and an association of borderline significance with polyresistant tuberculosis (aOR 1.8; 1.0–3.5; p = 0.062), among individuals born in the Western Pacific.

Our findings demonstrate that women aged 70 and older are 48.0% less likely to undergo surgery, although this observation was marginally significant (AOR: 0.52, [95% CI: 0.26–1.03], p = 0.062).

We also identified borderline significant interaction between RDW values and cancer stage ( p =0.062), which was consistent with subgroup analysis based on cancer stage (early stages and progressive stages).

The annual prevalence of CL were associated with annual average concentrations of PM 10 with borderline significance (P = 0.0621).

When we quantified this, we found a statistically marginally non-significant trend (p = 0.0622) towards increased endoneural IL-17+ cells in sural nerve biopsy tissue from CIDP patients compared to non-CIDP controls ( Fig 4B , S3 Table ).

A positive trend was observed in patients with critical illness and when samples were obtained >14 days after symptom onset [p = 0.0625].

The Terli group had nearly significant lower serum lactate levels than the LR or Vaso groups at 60 mins (p = 0.0627) and 90 mins (p = 0.089).

A generalized linear model ((PSS)~(exercise)*(condition)) showed quasi-significant coefficients of the effect of exercise ( p = 0.0628) and that of the interaction between Exercise #8 and the on-beat condition ( p = 0.0745).

All exposures analysed significantly increased Saa3 levels compared to the vehicle control, with the exception of the 18 μg/mouse dose exposure to NM-400, which was only borderline significant (P = 0.0629).

Longitudinally, the model also showed an interactive effect of LO and RO ( b = 0.06, SE = 0.02, p = .006), and a marginally significant main effect of partner LO ( b = -0.05, SE = 0.03, p = .063).

Although the median PSA level of patients found positive for prostate cancer (9.15 ng/ml) was higher than that of patients who were tested negative for prostate cancer (7.3 ng/ml), statistically the difference only tended towards significance (P = 0.063).

There was a marginally significant association between adequate knowledge and centers with increased HIV testing rates (OR 1.51; CI 95% 0.98–2.34; p = 0.063), as well as a statistically significant association between a strong knowledge base and centers with greater new HIV diagnosis rates (OR 1.61; CI 95% 1.04–2.49; p = 0.032).

Pairwise comparisons evidenced a decrease between baseline and week 4 of therapy at the limit of significance (p = 0.063) and a statistically significant decrease between baseline and week 8 of therapy (p = 0.023).

However, there was a strong trend for total cover ( F 1,4 = 6.499, P = 0.063) and spinifex cover ( F 1,4 = 7.464, P = 0.052) to be greater in areas where grazing intensity had been historically light rather than heavy.