Among other factors with marginal significance CD4 T-cell count (β = −0.21, P = 0.06) and age (β = −0.20, P = 0.06) were noted ( Table 3 ).
Excerpts
This relationship was only marginally significant in the low-status/individualistic norm condition, B = 0.18, t (148) = 1.86, p = .06, 95% CI [-0.01, 0.37], and was not significant in both the high-status/collectivistic norm condition, B = -0.08, t (148) = -0.76, p = .45, 95% CI [-0.28, 0.13], and the high-status/individualistic norm condition, B = 0.14, t (148) = 1.30, p = .20, 95% CI [-0.07, 0.36].
There was a significant difference among the groups in CES-D level ( F (4,95) = 3.38, p = .012) and a marginally significant difference in trajectory (appraisal group by months interaction F (4,386) = 2.24, p = .06).
In contrast, there was only a nonsignificant trend towards clustering by diagnosis ( Fig 2A ; R 2 = 0.07, p = 0.06).
There was also marginally significant effect of item-type, F(1,54) = 3.839, p<0.06, which reflected the children's overall better performance on the even numbers – 2, 4 & 6 – than the odd numbers – 3, 5 & 7 – in both the pre- and post-tests.
In addition, distribution of differentiation tended to differ by the SNP with a marginal significance ( P = 0.06, extended Fisher’s exact test).
There was also a marginally significant difference (multivariable-adjusted p = 0.06) in EQ-5D VAS scores between older and younger adults ( Table 2 ).
close to significancep = .06
Other interactions were not significant, although the Group × SOA interaction was close to significance ( p = .06).
The main effect of condition was marginally significant, F (3, 66) = 2.71, MSE = 27.31, p = .06, η 2 p = .11, and a significant Group × Condition interaction was found, F (3, 66) = 4.37, MSE = 27.31, p = .01, η 2 p = .17, reflecting the fact that especially blinkers required a relatively long target duration in the rotated distractors condition.
almost reached significancep = .060
Main effects of Violation almost reached significance at the main set of electrodes (violation: 3.0 μ V (SE = 0.9); neutral: 1.5 μ V (SE = 0.5); F(1,16) = 4.1; p = .060) and at the occipital electrodes (violation: 1.8 μ V (SE = 0.6); neutral: −0.2 μ V (SE = 1.0); F(1,16) = 3.6; p = .076).
showed a trendP = 0.0604
The mean dendritic segment length per branch order of BLA principal neurons showed a trend towards reduced branch segment length in long-term sucrose consuming rats compared to water controls ( P = 0.0604, two-way ANOVA) in apical dendrites.
This comparison was marginally significant, t(73) = 1.89, p = .061, d = 0.39.
close to significancep = 0.061
In our study PIK3CA mutations were equally frequent in pTa, pT1 and ≥pT2 tumors, however the correlation of PIK3CA mutations with low grade was close to significance (p = 0.061).
With respect to the probe trial, a marginally significant effect of heterogeneity was observed (Q (5) = 10.6, p = .061), contributing for 53.7% (I 2 ) of the variance in this model.
However, there was no significant difference in the type-specific HPV clearance rate except for a borderline significant difference in HPV 53 (γ-PGA vs. placebo: 55.6% vs. 13.3%, p = 0.061).
Thus, in the Pre-Pyrenees, there are statistically significant differences, especially in the case of the bearded vulture (average growth with wild ungulates only: −5±6%, growth in the real scenario: 4±3%, P = 0.028) and the griffon vulture (with wild ungulates only: 0.03±9%, growth in the real scenario: 10±1.6%, P = 0.039), being marginally significant in the case of the Egyptian vulture (with wild ungulates only: −2±8%, growth in the real scenario: 6±0.8%, P = 0.061).
approached significancep = 0.061
A group*trial interaction approached significance ( F (3,52) = 2.600, p = 0.061).
Variation in dissatisfaction rate by household financial status was marginally significant ( P = 0.061) while that by current age ( P = 0.802), gender ( P = 0.570), ethnicity ( P = 0.110), daily per capita income of the household ( P = 0.890), time since surgery ( P = 0.838), and IOL surgery ( P = 0.632) were not significant.
approached significancep = 0.061
On the other hand, the effects of the simple intervention on O 2 Hb approached significance ( B = –3.20 × 10 −07 mol/L, 95% CI [-6.54 × 10 −07 , 0.15 × 10 −07 ], p = 0.061; simple intervention < control).
approached significancep<0.061
In addition, we observed a weak correlation between the percentage of NADPH-d positive airway epithelium and FENO, although the model only approached significance (r = 0.45, p<0.061, Figure S3 ).
Having previous health education regarding DS was associated with higher a MHS (2.27 units higher); however, the relationship is marginally significant (p = 0.061).
a trend towards significancep = 0.061
When comparing patients with CAT 0–9 and CAT ≥10 the difference did not reach significance, although it showed a trend towards significance (p = 0.061, mean 39,9 vs 30,4 nmol/l) ( Table 1 ).
The effect of time on belief in free will controlling for political orientation was trending towards significance in Study 1 (p = .190) and reduced to marginal significance in Study 2 (p = .061).
After three days, for the first CT1 mutant line ( SLC6A8 Δex10-11/y ), we observed a 3.5-fold increase in intracellular creatine although this increase just failed to reach statistical significance ( Fig 4C , 4.2 vs 1.2 nmoles/mg protein relative to empty vector controls, P = 0.061, two-sided t-test).
borderline significanceP = 0.061
Furthermore, one mutation site was associated with survival at a borderline significance level: 1485 (RR, 2.461; 95% CI, 0.960–6.309; P = 0.061), without amino acid substitution in the RH domain ( Table 3 ).