Excerpts

However, in the diet plus exercise group, reduction in the nocturnal symptoms frequency was borderline significant (p = 0.06) and also clinically significant.

gattii , with a trend towards significance for TNF-α ( P = 0.06).

Group of patients with acute histologic chorioamnionitis had significantly lower gestational age at PPROM, lower gestational age at delivery, and had higher rate of corticosteroid use with marginal significance (p = 0.06).

There was a marginally significant main effect for situation, F (1,94) = 3.636, p = .06, η 2 = .037 . .

Without statistical difference, an increasing trend of fibrosis score in the liver tissues from OLETF rats was reversed by 6-week rimonabant administration (P = 0.06, Fig 3C and 3D ).

Positive work approached significance (p = 0.06) and peak force per push (0.40) did not change significantly between the pre- and the post-test.

The excursion of the upper arm increased, approaching significance (297→342 mm, p = 0.06).

3.5 Acoustic startle response and sensorimotor gating The genotype had no impact on the acoustic startle response to various startle pulses [RM ANOVA, ‘genotype’ by ‘startle’: F(2,96) = 1.2, p = .3] but there was a strong trend for a ‘sex’ by ‘startle’ interaction [F(2,96) = 3.0, p = .06] ( Fig 4A ).

The IVR rate in patients without manipulation during URS was not different to those with manipulation ( P = 0.658), and higher than those without URS although there was a statistically marginal significance ( P = 0.060, Fig 3 ).

β = 0.82, p = 0.001) and was of borderline significance at maximal urine concentration (St. β = 0.58, p = 0.06).

We observed a borderline significance of SERPINA6 expression among the CC, CG and GG genotype carriers (Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA test: P = 0.060).

Despite this assay-effect, preferences were highly correlated between assays (r = 0.94), though with only four lines tested, this correlation is only marginally significant ( p = 0.06).

Only age was significantly associated with Trails-B performance ( β = 0.29, p = 0.02), and receipt of chemotherapy approached significance ( β = -0.24, p = 0.06).

For the two latter species, results are marginally non-significant ( P = 0.06, Table 1 ).

When considering single emotions, a significant positive correlation between recognition and expressivity scores was revealed only for surprise (r = 0.55, p = 0.01) in the PD group and a tendency toward statistical significance was also observed for disgust (r = 0.4, p = 0.06) for the same group.

Looking time at face The regression model predicting the difference in looking time at the actor’s face from before to after the ball was stolen approached significance, F (5, 45) = 2.33, p = .06, adj.

WNV was detected only in swabs obtained from birds in the 10 7 and 10 5 challenge groups, (5/8, 63%, CI 30–87%, and 2/13,15%, CI 2–39%, respectively) ( Table 1 ), a difference in proportions that was only marginally significant (Fisher’s Exact test p = 0.06), but WNV was shed orally in significantly more birds of the 10 7 group as compared to the 10 3 group (Fisher’s exact test, p = 0.009).

microti , but the correlation was marginally non-significant (t = 2.2, P = 0.06) ( Fig. 3 ).

Analysis of total distance over days indicated a trend of genotype approaching significance [F(1,17) = 3.99, p = 0.06].

Infant hypertonicity also showed a negative trend in its association with HSD11B2 methylation (ρ = −0.11, P = 0.06), while infant attention showed a positive trend in its association with HSD11B2 methylation, with increasing methylation related to increasing infant attention scores (ρ = 0.14, P = 0.08).

In Colon cancer, sex approached marginal significance (HR = 0.51, p = 0.06) but follow-up duration did not (HR = 0.98, p = 0.62), with moderate heterogeneity for follow-up.

A main effect of group ( F (1,120) = 15.56, p < 0.001), and an almost significant main effect of time ( F (2,120) = 2.88, p = 0.06) also emerged.

However, the loss -of-function Arg-307-Glu polymorphism of P2X7R is associated with IBD, albeit the association is borderline significant (p = 0.06) from a relatively small number of cases and unaccompanied by any association between IBD and other loss- or gain-of-function polymorphisms [ 25 ].

This pair of reaches was significantly different prior to the initiation of dam removal activities in 2008 and approached significance (p = 0.06) in 2009, the year during dam removal.

Yet, in our model, parrotfish density was marginally significant ( p = 0.06), the component of variance was minor and lower than other significant variables (3.9%), and no interactions were observed with taxa.