In the second session, we observed a nearly significant relation between Stimulus Intensity, Attention Condition and Individual Training Time for the post-post2 group, F (1,11) = 4.4, p = 0.06, η p 2 = 0.28, but we found no relation between Individual Training Time and Stimulus Intensity when separate tests were performed per attention condition ( p > 0.35).
Excerpts
Even though the significance was lost in the fully adjusted model, a strong trend ( P = 0.06) for a positive association between serum DMA concentration and increased cIMT was still apparent.
For Theravada meditation, we observed a marginally significant main effect of Condition (Rest, Kasina, Vipassana): F(2,18) = 3.2, p = 0.06.
a trend towards significancep = 0.06
There was also a trend towards significance for the language inclusion variable (p = 0.06).
A main effect of group ( F (1,120) = 15.56, p < 0.001), and an almost significant main effect of time ( F (2,120) = 2.88, p = 0.06) also emerged.
of borderline significancep = 0.06
However, the correlation with number of visits to outpatient services was brought down to a level of borderline significance [b (se) = 5.30 (2.79), p = 0.06].
The exception was the age difference between the two groups, which was close to being statistically significant (p = 0.06).
Prehension There was a near-significant tendency for full-grasp to occur less frequently with increasing recall-delay [75% of trials for DT=0s and 57-67% for DT=2-10s; F(3,54)=2.62, p=0.060]; however, there was no significant effect on frequency of hand-handhold collision (2-8% of trials for DT=0-10s; p=0.42).
Lastly, a borderline significant effect was observed for miR-24-3p (p-value = 0.06).
An accompanying peak was observed at 22 Hz over C3 ( Fig 2 ) after termination ( M = 2.71 μV, SD = 1.35) over the last contraction second ( M = 2.01 μV, SD = 1.17) with marginal significance t (19) = 1.98, p = .06, d z = .44, which likely represents a harmonic component of the upper alpha enhancement [ 44 ].
The effect of affective reaction on sunk-cost scores was only marginally significant under low cognitive load, β = .21, t (123) = 1.90, p = .060, η p 2 = .05.
Feeding the low fat diet, however, lowers myoglobin levels in Cpt1b m-/- mice to the point where they are no longer significantly higher than controls fed the same diet (p = 0.17), but are lower than Cpt1b m-/- mice fed a chow diet with marginal significance (p = 0.06).
P-content (percent of dry mass) was relatively high in normal samples ( Figure 1A ) from both kidney and liver (∼0.75–0.85%) compared to samples from colon and lung (∼0.55%), although this overall difference was only marginally significant (p = 0.06).
For the Agg line, winning a territory increased mating success, while losing a territory was correlated with failure to mate, particularly with females from line 65 choosing (n = 27, P = 0.002) – this pattern is only borderline significant among females overall (n = 81, P = 0.06).
of borderline significanceP = 0.06
Additionally, Mlh1 , and Sfrp1 which had shown age-related expression decrease of borderline significance (1.4 fold, P = 0.06) in the Mlh1 +/- WD* group ( Table S5 ) and is a well-known gene in CRC and Wnt signaling were studied for methylation.
Although it did not reach statistical significance, we could see a clear trend in decreased urotensin concentration in the athletes compared to the control subjects ( p -value = 0.06).
There was a marginally significant positive relationship between private allelic richness and forest cover ( z = 1.86, P = 0.06).
Neuromuscular Fatigue and its Central and Peripheral Components As shown in figures 2 and 3 , MVC declined significantly by −10.2±3.6% for KE ( P <0.01, d = 0.50) and a strong trend (−10.7±16.1%) was observed for PF ( P = 0.06, d = 0.82) after the SMM.
The difference in prevalence of haplogroup J was only borderline significant when the HCM group was compared with the population controls, 3.3% vs. 9.1% (p = 0.06) ( Table 5 ) yielding an, OR = 0.34, CI = [0.07-1.03]) ( Table 6 ).
of borderline significancep = 0.06
N+) was of borderline significance (p = 0.06).
borderline significancep = 0.060
After adjustment, the risk further decreased to 11-fold (1/0.088) lower, with borderline significance ( p = 0.060).
borderline significancep = 0.06
COMT 24938A/G was associated with waist circumference at S-46 with borderline significance, where an increment of five cm in waist circumference increased the odds for the GG-genotype by 4% (OR = 1.04, CI = 1.00–1.09, p = 0.06).
We found that FI-TP, but not FI-DES administration, caused significant increases in the expression of INS (P<0.05), PDX1 ( P <0.05), INSR ( P <0.01), and a strong trend in the case of IGF1R ( P = 0.06) ( Fig. 6A ).
A marginally significant main effect of tDCS condition was found on overall RTs at recognition ( F (2,20) = 3.2, P = 0.06, η p 2 = 0.24), but not of stimulus familiarity ( F (1,10) = 1.5, P >0.1, η p 2 = 0.13) or interaction ( F (2,20) = 0.64, P >0.1, η p 2 = 0.06).
However, there was weak evidence of a decreasing trend in annual incidence among AGYW aged 15–20 years from 2011 to 2015 (RR for linear trend from one year to the next = 0.93, 95%CI = 0.87–1.00, p = 0.06; S1 Table and S1 Fig ).