Deer groups tended (marginally significant, with P = 0.06) to diffuse at a faster rate when they travelled in areas composed of a smaller percentage of potential foraging patches.
Excerpts
showed a trendp = 0.06
Naivety scores were modestly but significantly positively correlated with recognition of the context-atypical objects (point-biserial correlation, r = .21, p <0.05) and unfamiliar objects ( r = .25, p <0.01) and showed a trend toward a positive correlation for context-typical objects ( r = .16, p = 0.06).
Even if this result becomes marginally significant ( p = .06) when impulsivity-related variables are included in the regression model, it suggests that switching off FB-related notifications can constitute a protective factor against problematic use.
showed a trendP = 0.06
Calculations, furthermore, showed a trend towards significant differences in ONLS scores and mobility tests (P = 0.06; 0.053).
Group of patients with acute histologic chorioamnionitis had significantly lower gestational age at PPROM, lower gestational age at delivery, and had higher rate of corticosteroid use with marginal significance (p = 0.06).
Spatial position (right/left) presented a marginally significant effect ( F (1,33) = 3.63, p = 0.06, η 2 = 0.1), right spatial position tending to be associated with shorter response times.
IL-6 (but not CRP) was a marginally significant predictor ( P = 0.06) of GFDCAV at 5 years ( Table 3 ).
There was a marginally significant association among treatment categories and satisfaction of the patient with TB (p = 0.06).
close to significancep = 0.06
Close inspection of our data revealed a main effect of rod starting position, close to significance, in the haptic modality of response (F(1, 12) = 4.127, p = 0.06).
approached significancep< 0.06
Circulating ADMA increased and approached significance (p< 0.06).
Pureit users whose device indicated the need for a replacement battery had higher levels of fecal contamination in their drinking water than those with a functioning battery, though that difference was marginally insignificant (p = 0.06) (data not shown).
showed a trendp<0.06
This analysis revealed a significant block × site interaction (p<0.01, F 4,5 = 5.41), Site showed a significant effect on sensation of movement (p<0.001, F 4,5 = 12.86) and sensory block showed a trend on sensation of movement (p<0.06, F 1,5 = 5.10).
We found that FI-TP, but not FI-DES administration, caused significant increases in the expression of INS (P<0.05), PDX1 ( P <0.05), INSR ( P <0.01), and a strong trend in the case of IGF1R ( P = 0.06) ( Fig. 6A ).
borderline non-significantp = 0.060
Between-arm differences in sexual satisfaction changes were statistically significant (p = 0.027), while differences in erectile function changes were borderline non-significant (p = 0.060).
close to significancep = 0.06
Phase alignment is weaker for the second alap section with 2 participants showing significant alignment and 3 close to significance (Kuiper p = 0.06).
We observed that the higher the recorded coverage is, the higher the sensitivity is, and the correlation is marginally significant (p = 0.06).
borderline significanceP = 0.06
However, SFTPA , CEACAM5 and DSG3 exhibited similar trends, with borderline significance (P = 0.06, P = 0.07, and P = 0.09, respectively).
-13.55±12.48%, p = 0.04; Fig 2 ) and a statistical trend towards a postprocedural improvement in R t V global longitudinal strain (-8.24±6.25% vs. -13.47±7.61%, p = 0.06).
borderline significancep = 0.06
Univariate Cox regression of continuous miR-133b ratio showed borderline significance of miR-133b as predictive marker for biochemical relapse (HR = 0.16; 95% CI = 0.02–1.06; p = 0.06).
In the WT -treated group, this effect was borderline significant ( WT vs. medium P = 0.06 ) ( Figure 3B ).
The bla NDM gene exhibited a near-significant association with salad samples (χ2 = 3.6, p = 0.06).
P-content (percent of dry mass) was relatively high in normal samples ( Figure 1A ) from both kidney and liver (∼0.75–0.85%) compared to samples from colon and lung (∼0.55%), although this overall difference was only marginally significant (p = 0.06).
In contrast, I bs was only a relatively weak and marginally significant (Beta = 0.180, p = 0.06) predictor of female obesity prevalence ( Table 5 ).
Although STI incidence between sites was relatively similar, there was a nonsignificant trend towards a greater incidence of multiple active STIs at the eThekwini site compared to the Tshwane site (48.9/100wy and 8.3/100wy respectively; S4 Table , p = 0.06).
Serum at baseline and liver at S45-B are nearly significant models, with p = 0.06.