The authors also indicated in the last paragraph of the results that,the association between the number of new cases and time was marginally statistically significant (P=0.054).
Excerpts
This simpler comparison revealed reduced probability of staying after common, rewarded trials between groups in the neutral condition, which was just short of significance (p-value = 0.054), indicating a potentially weaker model-based learning capacity in ED.
The remaining 35% of the overall impact of the incident 5 were estimated to be marginally significant in a longer-term basis (step function: ω = 61.9, 95%CI = −0.9, 124.8, p = 0.054).
While the AERP exhibited a decreasing trend compared the CRAP+RSD group with the sham-operated group, the probability value was not significantly different (p = 0.054).
showed a trendp = 0.054
Moreover, splenomegaly showed a trend to significance with LC [OR 2.72 (95% CI 0.98, 7.54); p = 0.054].
MET Analyses revealed an almost significant Treatment Condition effect on Explicit (p = .054) and a significant effect on Implicit (p = .026) Emotional Empathy.
Importantly, a significant increase in the activation of CD4 + T cells was found in the aortic root ( Figure 5f, p = 0.03) and a strong trend towards increased activation was similarly observed in the aorta ( Figure 5k, p = 0.054).
approached significancep = 0.054
Only Respiratory Function ( t = -2.234, p = 0.028) remained as significant independent predictor of White Matter Microstructure ( Table 5 ), although troponin T approached significance ( p = 0.054).
approached significancep = 0.054
Analysis of the novelty discrimination index revealed a significant sex × dose interaction approached significance (F (3, 108) = 2.628, p = 0.054).
Interventions set in the school were approaching significance, with a small effect ( z (3) = 1.925, p = 0.054, Hedge's g = 0.408, 95%CI = -0.007–0.824), and interventions set in the home did not have a significant effect on improving pragmatic language skills when compared to the other settings ( z (2) = 1.846, p = 0.065).
This analysis revealed a marginally significant effect of the moderator (group) on the relationship between urinary interoception and chronic pelvic pain (Estimate: -0.00440 (SE = 0.00228, Z = -1.93, p = 0.054).
The only difference was that the borderline significant association of sexual harassment with elevated depression in the incomplete data set (p = 0.054) became significant in the complete data set (p = 0.011) ( Table 4 ).
Although the effect was almost significant (p = 0.054) in the German sample, we cannot verify our hypothesis.
This finding was marginally significant ( p = 0.054).
However, there was a marginally significant association between PIQ and recognition memory performance in the DD group ( r = .594, p = .054), confirming the desirability to control for PIQ in the group comparison of recognition memory.
borderline significancep<0.054
Regarding use of LARCs, lower rates were observed in South Africa, Malawi, and Uganda relative to Zimbabwe; significantly lower in South Africa, aPRR = 0.39 (95% CI: 0.26–0.57), p<0.001, borderline significance in Uganda, aPRR = 0.65 (95% CI: 0.42–1.01), p<0.054, while the lower rates in Malawi were not statistically significant, aPRR = 0.87 (95% CI: 0.64–1.19), p = 0.386.
This latter result was largely responsible for the nearly significant height-understory interaction ( F 1,99 = 3.8, P = 0.054).
It also showed a significant effect of population of origin (F 1,118 = 8.654, P = 0.004) and marginally significant effect of season (F 1,118 = 3.792, P = 0.054) on gut length in guppies.
Although the later sample was rather small, significant differences in relative head length and depth of caudal peduncle, as well as a nearly significant ( p = 0.054) difference in body depth, were revealed between GN sampled in 2009 and 2019 ( Fig 7 ).
Results revealed that group differences across two stressors were approaching significance during t4 (stressor): F (1, 88) = 3.81, p = .054.
Participants who performed task set A (mean, 9.17, SD, 4.93) performed worse than those who performed set B (mean, 11.64, SD, 5.37), but this result only just reached marginal significance ( t = −2.03, p = 0.054)( Table 2 ).
showed a trendp = 0.054
Haemorrhagic manifestations showed a trend toward higher rates in females (15.6% vs 12.0%, OR 0.74, 95% CI: 0.55–0.99, p = 0.054).
On the other hand, model MAD and MAED were superior to model MA at a level approaching to statistical significance (P = 0.054 for MAD vs.
This effect revealed a strong trend for more related events in the G-CSF group when comparing absolute numbers (Chi Square Test p = 0.054).
did not quite reach significanceP = 0.054
In a tri-variate analysis with all three parameters, the influence of pAkt-IR did not quite reach significance (P = 0.054, Table 4 ).