Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

near-significantp = .0531.1× alphagold
Although a follow-up three (TDM category) by two (measure of Benevolence) ANOVA did not produce a significant interaction of category and measure, F (2,1643) = 2.36, p = .094, another analysis limited to individualists and competitors did find a near-significant interaction of category and measure, F (1,500) = 3.77, p = .053.
almost significantlyP = 0.0531.1× alpha
Soil temperature was not higher in the squares containing more larvae ( t = −0.16, P = 0.55, LMM), and it was almost significantly higher in cages containing larvae [24.63 ± 0.13°C (mean ± SE, n = 8 cages)] than in those without larvae [24.48 ± 0.13°C (mean ± SE, n = 8 cages), t 7 = 2.32, P = 0.053, paired t -test].
borderline significantP = 0.0531.1× alphagold
Joint Analysis of Pneumonitis Risk Alleles In combined analysis, the significant SNPs together with an additional borderline significant variant – IL4R: rs1801275 ( P = 0.053) – showed an increase in pneumonitis risk as the number of unfavorable genotypes increased ( Table 3 ).
showed a trendp = .0531.1× alpha
Although not significant, the association of MBG and decline in GFR still showed a trend for significance after adjustment for baseline variables mean plasma calcium (β = -.375; p = .053), systolic BP (β = -.361; p = .056) and albuminuria (β = -.372; p = .063), but not for present diabetes mellitus type I or II at baseline (N = 6; β = -.339; p = .074), history of smoking at baseline (β = -.319; p = .107), and fasting glucose at baseline (β = -.301; p = .106), LDL at baseline (β = -.363; p = .081), bicarbonate (β = -.165; p = .442), and 24-hour sodium excretion (β = -.375; p = .077).
almost reached significancep = 0.0531.1× alpha
The comparison of the full model with the fixed effects species (orangutans, chimpanzees), condition (Take, Give, Control 1: No food, Control 2: No victim), and population (zoo, sanctuary) and all interactions between them up to the third order, and victim and helper as random effects was compared to the null model with the factor population and all interactions with it excluded almost reached significance (χ 2 (8) = 15.31, p = 0.053).
approached significancep = .0531.1× alpha
Because measures of motivation (response latencies and trial omissions) were unchanged across this final range of sessions ( p >.05), we examined the correlation between MAD values and mean retention intervals across this final range the correlation approached significance, r = .45, p = .053 ( Figure 3D ).