Excerpts

Health Health assessments showed main effects of assessor ethnicity and assessor gender but just failed to reach significance for face ethnicity ( p = 0.051) ( Table 3 ).

In univariate analysis of the pilot patient results, only the presence of a BRAF mutation showed a trend toward significant correlation with increased CTC levels (p = 0.051).

The main effect of proposer attractiveness and proposer sex were only marginally significant, F (1, 57) = 3.97, p = .051, η p 2 = .065, and F (1, 57) = 3.98, p = .051, η p 2 = .065, respectively.

For typically developing younger children, the T1–T2 Mean CRI ( r (23) = .53, p = .009) and Repetitive Behaviors ( r (23) = .57, p = .005) were correlated, but “Just Right” Behaviors were not (although they approached significance at p = .051).

For the lag at the upper end of our expectation, i.e., a lag of nine years, the autocorrelation is weakly significant (p = .051), see Table 1 .

The steroidogenic response under the influence of the highest volume of study sera was marginally higher than that of the corresponding volume of control sera; however, statistically the difference was not quite significant ( P = 0.051).

However, the interaction between vocabulary size and word type was approaching significance ( p = .051, semi partial R m 2 = . 13 ); high-vocabulary infants had a novelty preference, looking longer at non-words ( M raw = 7483.887, SE raw = 888.012) than words (M raw = 5477.855, SE raw = 529.748), whereas low-vocabulary infants had a familiarity preference, looking longer at words ( M raw = 9549.288, SE raw = 1082.154) than non-words ( M raw = 7998.033, SE raw = 734.504; see Fig 2 ).

The post hoc test indicated that there was a near-significant increase in the number of obtained rewards in the 100 μA group when compared to the other stimulation intensities (P = 0.051).

Similarly, line R had an almost significantly (p-value = 0.051) greater C value than line A.

a marginally non-significant interaction between sex and age (p = 0.051), with anti-KLH nIgM decreasing with age in females.

Only the MFA values of the lIFOF in the second time point had a marginally significant difference (F>M), t (36) = 2.02, P = 0.051. l IFOF Here, a significant main effect of time was revealed, F (1, 35) = 49.94, P < 0.01 with a large effect size η 2 = 0.588.

Mann-Whitney U-test for the distribution across categories (natural hair compared to treated hair) showed that treated hair samples had higher testosterone concentrations, with the test statistic verging on significance (p = 0.051; Fig 2 ).

The resulting correlation approached significance ( r = 0.473, p = 0.051).

Age and Respiratory Quotient There was a clear trend towards an age-related change in 24 h RQ and RQ MEI at 22°C, with the 15 mo old animals showing the lowest RQ values ( P = 0.051 to 0.077) ( Table 2 ).

However, in our intention-to-treat analysis, the use of metformin in people prescribed insulin was still associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality, and risk approached significance for the MACE endpoint (p = 0.051).

This means that a strongly nonsignificant p -value is equally likely to be treated by publication selection bias and dropped with an equal probability in the case of publication bias as it is in the case of p-hacking (e.g., borderline significant results, p = 0.051 or far off p = 0.9).

SHSE was associated with depressive symptoms in male adolescents with borderline significance (p = 0.051).When comparing female to male adolescents with depressive symptoms, female adolescents reported higher rates of SHSE compared with male adolescents (28.5% and 23.3% for occasional SHSE and 16.4% and 13.0% for regular SHSE, respectively).

We tested this difference and found a borderline significance (z = 1.949; p = 0.051; ratio of ORs 1.4; 95% CI 1.0 to 2.1).

Whereas infants and apes both pointed more frequently towards the other side when the reward was located there (Wilcoxon signed-ranks test; infants: T + = 45.0, N = 9, p = .004; apes: T + = 59.5, N = 11, p = .018), only infants exhibited a marginal trend to direct more pointing gestures towards the other side when the experimenter was attentive (Wilcoxon signed-ranks test; infants: T + = 39.0, N = 9, p = .051; apes: T + = 40.0, N = 11, p = .544).

The analysis revealed significant main effects of face age, F (1,34) = 6.36, p <.05, η 2 = .158, and orientation, F (1,34) = 46.71, p <.001, η 2 = .579, which were both qualified by a marginally significant Face Age × Orientation interaction, F (1,34) = 4.07, p = .051, η 2 = .107.

Age was shown to have a marginally significant influence on the tibial meniscal SH at the medial (p = 0.051) and lateral (p = 0.09) region B and medial region C (p = 0.054).

Men reported low levels of support for FGC in response to the direct question, 8.3% (95% CI [5.4–11.1]) rising to 18.5% (95% CI [8.7–28.3]) in response to the UCT, (at borderline significance, p = 0.051).

Log-rank test showed a near-significant difference among the three groups (P = 0.051).

Using the same statistical analysis of cortical damage in coronal sections 2–4 indicated a strong trend towards protection for tBH4-DCs compared to GFP-DC (P = 0.051).

Interestingly, we found a marginally non-significant correlation between the percentage of intrathymic fat and the BMI as surrogate of the body weight (Pearson correlation 0.44, p = 0.051).