Excerpts

Inattention After controlling for the covariates of ethnicity and age, analysis of omission errors showed no significant effect of Time ( F (1, 132) = 3.44, p = .066, ηp 2 = .025), TRP ( F (2, 132) = .2.02, p = .137, ηp 2 = .030) or Group ( F (2, 132) = 3.75, p = .055, ηp 2 = .028), although arguably the latter could be considered a trend towards significance with the Control group producing fewer errors than both ADHD groups ( p < 0.05) as demonstrated by contrast analysis.

In addition, we observed a marginally non-significant main effect of gender , F (1,115) = 3.84, MSE = 9.23, p = .05, ηp 2 = .032, with boys keeping a higher number of stickers ( M = 9.01, SE = 0.36) than girls ( M = 8.00, SE = 0.39; Fig 1B ).

A dose-response antibody effect was suggested by higher mean antibody responses in the full-dose malaria vaccine group compared to half-dose group, with these differences approaching but not reaching significance at study days 74, 90, and 180 ( p = 0.050, 0.053, and 0.079, respectively).

Metabolomic analyses Positive ion metabolites that were identified as nominally significant (p≤0.05) in SAMS patients are shown in S5 Table of S3 File .

For the control group, no difference was found between the pre-measure and the half-way measure, and the pre-measure and the post-measure, p = .600, p = .608, respectively; the control group demonstrated a marginally significant improvement from the half-way measure to the post-measure, p = .050.

Body composition, measured at week 15, showed a trend to increased lean body mass in the herring-fed mice in comparison with the beef-fed (p-value = 0.050).

Importantly in CONV mice ileal TNF-α showed strong and highly significant correlation with plasma insulin and plasma glucose (R values: insulin = 0.89, P <0.05; glucose = 0.93, P <0.05) at the 16-week time point ( Table 5 ), and this was a particularly strong correlation.

In older adults, the main effect of position was marginally significant, F (3,33) = 2.901, p = 0.05, and the P2 amplitude was greater at the 3 rd than the 4 th position ( p = 0.049).

The results were presented as the means ± SD, and the significant and extremely significant levels were set at P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively.

In addition, the top 100 transcripts from the reanalysis of dataset #1 were all nominally significant ( P <0.05) in our analysis of the pooled datasets and 20 transcripts were shared between the top 100 transcripts from dataset #1 and the pooled analyses.

Sex-specific SI Trends during Growth The interaction effect of categorical age (<6 or ≥6 years) and sex on SI was nominally significant ( p = 0.05).

For SSRC, the test was barely significant (p-value ~ 0.05), suggesting that it suffers from a lack of power to detect a specific pattern for this parameter.

There was a statistically significant moderate positive correlation between total brain volume (%ICV) and EZ-RPE volume in PD group (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.482, P = .04), normal cognition control group (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.514, P < .01) and a marginally significant moderate positive correlation in AD dementia group (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.526, P = .05) ( Fig 3 ).

The D(1) seems to be related to the Shannon diversity index H , Kendall's rank correlation is highly significant (tau = −0.52, P<0.05) ( Figure 6 ).

Line 145-146: Can the authors provide any more specifics regarding what type of shark deterrents (e.g., magnetic, electrical, etc.) or make/model were used? Line 159: Marginally non-significant when p>0.05 (p = 0.068).

A 2 (context) × 2 (relative outcome magnitude) × 2 (valence) repeated measure analysis of variance (ANOVA) conducted on the response time (RT) for making the initial choice in the trial following presentation of outcomes, yielded a marginally significant effect of valence factor, F(1, 17) = 4.456, p = .050, with a longer response time after wins (769.495±378.808 ms) than after losses (649.482±227.666 ms).

In adjusted multivariable analysis, though, daily fruits and vegetable consumption narrowly missed statistical significance (p = 0.05), the finding is still of clinical relevance.

When determining the ratio of HRE-dependent firefly luciferase activity over the activity of the constitutively expressed Renilla luciferase, the inhibitory effects of mitomycin C, YC-1 and camptothecin were still highly significant ( Fig. 1c , lower panel, p <0.05).

The average difference of predictability between these two populations was a highly significant 0.10 (0.08 standard deviation, Wilcoxon sign-rank test p<0.05).

When NSCs were incubated with both LCD and KT5823 the inhibitory effects of the two blockers on neuronal differentiation were additive and highly significant ( P <0.05 at D3; P <0.0001 at D6; P <0.0001 at D10 vs. control; Figure 5H ).

The correlation between GLS measurements and the presence of grade ≥2 AR was borderline significant (r = 0.29, P = 0.05).

Comparing differences between both techniques, ΔCV 3mo of the 3, 5, and 7 mm diameter regions (P = .001 respectively) and ΔCV 12mo of the 5 and 7 mm diameter zones (P < .05) approached significance, as well as ΔCT 3mo and ΔCT 12mo for the central and 2, 4, and 6 mm diameter areas (P < .05).

There was a marginally significant difference between group means F (1, 32) = 4.05, p = .05, η p 2 = .11, with deaf children performing worse than hearing children.

3B , in the regions activated during Middle minus End trials, the contrast M-S minus M-L did not reveal significant signal difference in the parahippocampal region (PHC), but revealed marginally significant signal increase in the left lateral parietal region (IPL1) (t(71) = 2.6, P <0.05).

Results Immune Priming and Serratia Marcescens Infections For Experiment 1 ( Figure 1A, B ), the minimal model indicated a marginally non-significant interaction between aphid genotype, pre-exposure, and infection treatment upon second challenge (p = 0.05), which is reflected by the somewhat different responses of the two aphid genotypes (5A0, LSR1) to pre-exposure and subsequent live bacterial challenge ( Figure 1A,B ).