Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

In these analyses, the HRs for AD mortality in non-aspirin NSAIDs users remained decreased but did not reach statistical significance in adjusted Cox models (HR = 0.30, 95% CI = 0.10–0.94, p = 0.039, unadjusted Cox model; HR = 0.26, 95% CI = 0.10–1.10, p = 0.060, Model 1; and HR = 0.25, 95% CI = 0.10–1.03, p = 0.056, Model 2).
marginally significantp = 0.0390.8× alphagold
We found that there was a significant effect of a wall, forest size, and a significant wall * size interaction on seedling richness (Model: F 3,40 = 5.35, p = 0.034; wall F 1 = 7.15, p = 0.018; forest size: F 1 = 5.01, p = 0.031; wall * size, F 1 = 5.66, p = 0.022) and a marginally significant effect of wall and wall * size interation, but no effect of forest size, on seedling density (Model: F 3,40 = 3.06, p = 0.039; wall F 1 = 3.82, p = 0.058; forest size: F 1 = 2.27, p = 0.139; wall * size, F 1 = 3.99, p = 0.052).
modestly significantp -value = 0.0390.8× alphaqualifiedgold
Chi-squared test of proportions for the self-reported ethnicity marginal effects showed mixed evidence, with no significant difference from the null expectation in CATIE (χ 2 statistic = 1.214; χ 2 p -value = 0.865) and a modestly significant result in STAR*D (χ 2 statistic = 3.100; χ 2 p -value = 0.039).
nominally significantp = 0.0390.8× alphagold
Linear regression analysis using age, sex and intracranial volume as a priori predictors revealed that MAPT diplotype was a predictor of left insula and right cerebellar Crus II lobar volumes at a nominally significant level ( p = 0.039 and p = 0.033, respectively), with the H1 haplotype predicting lower grey matter volumes.
nominally significantp = 0.040.8× alphagold
At rs1477798 in 15q22.31 which showed evidence of linkage in clinic-based, larger families, a nominally significant case-control association was observed (OR 1.16, p = 0.04) which was modestly strengthened for cases with CRC family history (OR 1.24, p = 0.03); however, no significant difference in risk by family history was observed and associations were far from genome-wide significant.
a decreasing trendp = .040.8× alphagold
There was a significant difference in pleasantness ratings between congenital anosmics and controls (F(1, 26) = 6.71, p = .02) with the anosmics exhibiting higher ratings than the controls, a significant main repeated-measures effect on the ratings (F(1.85, 48) = 12.15, p<.001), which showed a decreasing trend over the course of consumption, as well as a significant portion*group interaction (F(1.85, 48) = 3.54, p = .04), with the anosmic participants experiencing a less pronounced decline.
mildly significantp = 0.040.8× alphaqualifiedgold
How much does differential homophily account for the distribution of HSV-2 and is there an epidemiologically relevant relationship between sexual homophily and geographic remoteness? Is there a relationship between the proportion of an individual’s homophilous contacts and their likelihood of having been exposed to HSV-2? Using a univariate logistic regression model, we found a mildly significant relationship between individuals’ proportion of homophilous sexual partners and having HSV-2 (OR = 1.8; 95% CI: 1.04–3.13; p = 0.04).